Anders Breivik’s 2083 European Declaration of Independence: In Depth Analysis

The Face of a Racist Maniac

The Portrait of a Sociopathic Maniac

After reading Oslo bomber Anders Breivik’s 1518 page, three book compendium on the history of multiculturalism, the justification for terrorism, methods of terrorism and descriptions of himself by himself, seven major conclusions can be made.  This article will list those conclusions with examples directly from the mouth & mind of Breivik to support them.   The length of this article is based on the incredible number of topics Breivik covered in his compendium- most of which are mentioned here.  After reading this analysis, you will know most of the content of Breivik’s manifesto, basic conclusions that can be drawn, and the basic layout of his work.   Lastly, this article attempts to take the reader into the mind of a maniac in order to understand why he did what he did on that fateful July 22, 2011 date in Oslo.

I.  Basic Conclusions:

1)  Breivik is someone very like Hannibal Lector.  Disturbingly violent & insane (he even questions & answers himself), but with a bizarrely charming & intelligent mind-  able to transition from his deeply delusional fantasies of being, literally, a Knight in shining armour to what appears to be a more lucid & rational ‘modern man’, aware of the geopolitical events around him.  He seamlessly binds the two together into a narrative that puts him in the light of being a martyred savior of Norway & broader Europe.  He seems self-aware of his deteriorating mental state and yet is able to use intelligent rationale to account for it.  He understands fully that he will be hated, but puts himself into a god-like position to ‘know’ better than the world around him.  He truly believes he is the founding father of a new European Federation that will be free of Marxist multiculturalism.  His mind swings wildly from magnanimous generosity toward his enemies & victims to steely cold murderous intention.  He does not seem aware of his contradictions.  He is full of self loathing for what he ‘used to be’ (a money-grubbing capitalist) and has now, like Lector, morphed into a new, more beautiful being- a Knight in shining white amour.  His descriptions of his childhood, teenage years and early adulthood are full of self hate.  His earliest years are described as full of ‘rule & law breaking’ while he was associated with leftist gangs in Oslo.  He eventually drops out of these gangs and begins to admire the skin heads at school, whom he claims are ‘law-abiding, more likable’ people. This transformation from something hateful into something to revere strikes me as his first and foremost illness and obsession.

“The phenomenon is called the self loathing complex also referred to as
“European guilt” in combination with the Marxist goal of destroying the European,
Christian, straight man.”

  He describes a critical point in his life where, severely disillusioned with modern life & his strife for worldly goods, he makes a radical decision to be a ‘better man’.  Thus enters the ‘Knighthood’ fantasy.

“Nevertheless, when I had acquired my millions (which was my old
goal in life) I found it all to be very superficial and disappointing. I grew tired of “the
game”, which re-enforced my opinion that I should rather strive to become a better man.
I grew from being a so called “arrogant self centered fuck” who didn’t care about anyone
except myself, my family and friends to something better.” 

2)  Breivik blames Matriarchy (dominance of women) & Muslims for his feelings of insecurity, possible homosexuality, and general impotence and simply piggybacks on the most relevent issue of his country now:  multiculturalism & the active recruitment of Muslim immigrants by the Norwegian government in efforts to create a cheap work force and sustain an aging population.  He welcomes the conclusion that Muslims, the ultimate Marxist tool, are to blame for his unhappiness.  His points to Muslim gang threats & violence against him in his youth as one of the major reasons for his ‘new’ mindset.  He also points to being raised by a single mother as the reason for his femininity.  In his mind, both the rise of the woman and the immigrant, both of whom have repressed his sense of manliness & strength, have been championed by the modern incarnation of Marxism:  multiculturalism.  He latches on to the  angry & disgusted writings of other scholarly minds of Norway to present the justification for his internal need for violence, validation & ultimate recognition.  He uses their cause to catapult his cause.  His need to ‘be more of a man’ and to ‘be a better man’ are satisfied by taking up the cause of the ‘repressed, indigenous Peoples’ of Europe (he compares himself to Sitting Bull) against the invaders (the Marxists & Muslims).  His obsession with Medieval Europe, his advocacy to the return to monarchies, his obsession with complex fantasy computer games, his use of the term ‘Christendom’ and at times, ‘old’ English and his clear motivation from the age of Chivalry all point to his inability to accept current realities and his need to revert to fantasy and a glorified ‘age of old’.  An ‘age’ where a man could be a man.  It also gives him the perfect avenue to exalt himself above the mundane ordinariness of normal life by becoming, literally, a Knight in Shining, White Armour.  More detailed information on these topics will be covered below.

“Above all, those who would defy Political Correctness must behave according to the old
rules of our culture, not the new rules the cultural Marxists lay down. Ladies should be
wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should still hold doors open for
ladies. Children should not be born out of wedlock. “

“I do not approve of the super-liberal, matriarchal upbringing though as it
completely lacked discipline and has contributed to feminise me to a certain degree.”

“There is no doubt in the media that the “man of today” is expected to be a touchy-feely
subspecies who bows to the radical feminist agenda. He is a staple of Hollywood, the
television network sitcoms and movies, and the political pundits of talk shows. The
feminisation is becoming so noticeable that newspapers and magazines are picking up on
it. For example, the Washington Times and National Review magazine combined to tell us
that “behind the breezy celebration of ‘guy stuff’ in today’s men’s magazine lurks a crisis
of confidence. What does it mean to be masculine in the 90s?” It is revealed that today’s
men’s magazines (Esquire, GQ, Men’s Health, Men’s Fitness, Men’s Journal, Details,
Maxim, Men’s Perspective)”are all geared to a new feminised man….” Some examples?
The old masculine attitude toward personal appearance is disappearing. If memory
serves, our fathers’ acts of personal upkeep were mostly limited to shaving and putting
on a tie. According to Lowry:
It’s hard to imagine [them] interested in articles on ‘A Flat Belly for the Beach’ (Verge), or
the three new men’s fragrances for the fall season (GQ), or even ‘The New Fall Suit’
(Esquire). But somewhere along the line men became less concerned with being strong and
silent, and more worried about making themselves pretty.
Indeed the feminisation of European culture is nearly completed. And the last bastion of
male domination, the police force and the military, is under assault.”

“And as Hedegaard dryly notes, if submission is what
many women seek, the feminised Danish men are boring compared to desert sheikhs
who won’t allow you to go outside without permission.”

“The newly feminised West gets attacked and assaulted by the Arab
and Islamic world, and continues to blame itself, while at the same time be fascinated by
its abusers. It is thus behaving in the same way as a self-loathing woman towards an
abusive man.”

“During my early youth while attending Smestad primary school in Oslo, Norway; I
remember being forced to complete mandatory knitting and sewing courses. These
courses were first implemented in various Western European countries as a result of
Marxist revolution which started all the way back in the 1930s but had its climax around
1968. These mandatory knitting and sewing courses were implemented with the goal of
deliberately contribute to feminise European boys in their insane quest to attempt to
create the Marxist utopia consisting of “true equality between the sexes”. I remember I
dreaded these courses as it felt very unnatural and was a complete waste of time. In
retrospect, however, I am grateful for having received this insight into sewing and
stitching as this knowledge is an essential skill when constructing and assembling
modern ballistic armour… It is quite ironic and even hilarious when reflecting on the fact
that a skill which was intended to feminize European boys can and will in fact be used to
re-implement the patriarchy by overthrowing the Western European cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist regimes.”

“A majority of the people who became entangled by the hiphop mentality came from broken
families. I remember that at least 80% of “my old crew” were in that category, myself
included. 15% came from families where the father was “a modern feminised male figure”
resulting in lack of authority and discipline. Only 5% had old fashioned fathers who had
respect and were the primary authority figure/role model for the individual”

3)  Breivik is an atheist.  That being said, he is completely obsessed with Medieval Catholicism- not for any religious reason, but for the political & social stances the Church had the power to implement on all of Europe at the time.  The most important of these edicts from Medieval Catholicism are 1)  the man is more important than the woman and 2) the Pope & Church called for Crusades against the Muslims.  As both these stances fully support Breivik’s need to feel more masculine, he latches on to the idea of the Medieval Church.  His preoccupation with Medieval Christianity fits beautifully with his deep, inner fantasy of being a Knight.   Further, he states that the reason he links his Resistance movement to the Church is for ‘marketing purposes’.  He desires to present his cause in the most positive, acceptable light to the males in Europe for recruitment purposes alone.  He describes, at length, the importance of marketing and outlines very lengthy, specific instructions for each Resistance ‘cell’.  Here is an excerpt:

“Sexy projections of females sell and inspire, in peacetime and during war. There will
primarily be men taking most of the risks so it should be a priority to appeal to a
broadest selection of European males. Resistance leaders/cell commanders or individual
cell operatives must prioritise to arrange and book a professional photo session prior to
operation for one or all involved. Resistance leaders of larger networks should also
arrange photo sessions with female patriotic models to use in online
marketing/recruitment campaigns. It is essential that enough resources are invested into
marketing material in order to create a professional and appealing image of our struggle.
It is essential that cell commanders and/or cell operatives budget at least a portion of
their operational budget to photo sessions and remember to delete all other unfortunate
photos from the past. This is to prevent the media/police from getting access to them
and exploit them for their own propaganda. The police usually “leak” “retarded looking”
photos to the press after raiding the cells apartment after an operation. By removing and
deleting all “negative” photos, and by making available the professional, photo shopped
photos prior to the operation; we make their job significantly harder.”

His choice of the Medieval version of the Catholic Church makes perfect sense as it fully integrates with his Knighthood fantasy AND it presents the best marketing angle possible for his new Resistance.

Q: Why did you choose an allegiance to a group with Christian values and pan-
European goals instead of a purely national/regional group?

A: Many have asked this question. My choice has nothing to do with the fact that I am
not proud of my own traditions and heritage. My choice was based purely pragmatism.
All Europeans are in this boat together so we must choose a more moderate platform
that can appeal to a great number of Europeans – preferably up to 50% (realistically up
to 35%). Choosing a local/national group would be counterproductive as all the groups I
am familiar with are Odinist orientated and not Christian identity groups. It is essential
that we choose a banner that has the potential to appeal towards central and southern
Europeans as well.

“As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence
over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science and it must always
continue to be that way.”


“Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious
man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter of a
monocultural Christian Europe.”

“A majority of so called agnostics and atheists in Europe are cultural conservative
Christians without even knowing it.

Q:  “So what is the difference between cultural Christians and religious Christians?”

A:   “If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious
Christian.   Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship
with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social,
identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian.”

“A majority of Christians, especially liberal, humanist Christians oppose the doctrines of
self defence. I believe that self defence is a central part of Christianity as documented in
another part of this book. The modern day pacifist Christianity is among other things a
result of our current regimes and their deliberate influence of the Church. They castrated
and made the Church impotent and irrelevant, we will rejuvenate it by implementing our
own reforms. But pragmatism will be the basis for which direction we chose to go. A
strong church (on certain areas) is essential for the unity of our European countries.”

Q:Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?”
A: “As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily
constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus. Being
a Christian can mean many things;
- That you believe in and want to protect Europe’s Christian cultural heritage.
The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included),
our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity – Protestantism,
Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and the legacy of the European enlightenment (reason
is the primary source and legitimacy for authority).
It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight
for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern
societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the
enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “Christian
fundamentalist theocracy” (everything we do not want) and a secular European society
based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want).
So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our
Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christianatheist
(an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian
cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).
The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation but rather a
Christian “culturalist” military order.”

Similarly, when Breivik mentions Christendom, he refers to a political entity, separate from the Church’s spiritual entity.  This idea of Christendom fits beautifully with his need to feel super masculine as a pledged Knight in the tradition of King Arther & Medieval Crusaders without requiring him to have any spiritual feelings concerning God or Jesus:

“Within Christian political thought there has been traditionally a distinction, if not a
separation, of the institution of the state and the institution of the church. Ironically, this
distinction Liberal Secular Democracies inherited from a Christian political entity called
‘Christianitas,’ more commonly known as Christendom. The distinction was made to safe
guard the institutional church from being interfered with by the kings, (and other leading
members of the laity) in its appointment of Bishops and clergy. The idea of ‘secular’ and
‘religious’, referred to the power of the king and bishops in their respective spheres and
execution of duties, one concerned with the temporal and profane, the other with the
spiritual and sacred.”

He further rails against the Protestant and Catholic Churches for their peaceful stances and considers them part of the Marxist multiculturalism that is overtaking Europe.  He states that the Protest faith will be abolished into a ‘new’ Catholic Order- in the fashion of the Medieval Ages- which would advocate and pay for many crusades to ‘contain’ and ‘isolate’ the Muslim lands.  He references many historical accounts of Muslim aggression into Christian lands, as well as the current jihad movement, as his justification & necessity for a renewal of Crusades.  His attraction to the Catholic church is more focused on it as a potent organization and motivational entity to be used against multiculturalism & Islam than for Jesus and/or God that it should represent.

To conclude, Breivik’s obsession concerning Christendom, the Pope, the Monarchy & the Catholic Church are all props to support his fantasy of being a Medieval Knight in addition to providing the ‘attractive’ front to his otherwise cruel organization.

4)  Breivik is a sociopathic insane individual.  There are many levels of proof for this assertion.  This article will go through them one by one:

Proof of his insanity lies in his complete immersion into the fantasy of knighthood.  The motivation to live in a Knighthood fantasy is clear:  it allows him to receive hyper masculinity, the ultimate recognition and even immortality.

“We are some of the founding fathers of the new world order. The conservative martyrs of
today, both democratic and revolutionary, will be remembered and celebrated as the
founding fathers when our cultural conservative world order has been established in the
European world within 20-70 years.”

He dedicates 51 pages to the ceremony of Knighthood, the medals of Knighthood (which he no doubt believes he has already earned), the uniform of Knighthood and ironically, the financial rewards of Knighthood (properties seized from the Multiculturalists), the organizational structure of the Knighthood, the official salute of the Knight (a clenched fist raised with the right arm) along with a detailed explanation of its meaning, and fully detailed responsibilities for the positions within the Knighthood.  Countless hours or even years were dedicated to these precise definitions.  The very nature of these names & descriptions makes one wonder if his complete immersion in his fantasy computer world was the inspiration for his fantasy.  Take, for example, the oath of Knighthood (only a short excerpt),

I acknowledge and agree to follow and embrace the road of ultimate sacrifice and
martyrdom should the situation require it. Under such circumstances I will not fear death
but I will embrace it. I agree to this in order to secure the sovereignty of my country, the
freedom of my people, my family and my friends, for their children and grandchildren’s
sake, for the preservation of my culture, for Christendom and for the preservation of
everything I hold dear.
I will strive to be truly a fearless knight and secure on every side, for my soul is
protected by the armour of faith, the truth, ideological confidence and a just cause, just
as my body is protected by the armour of steel. I am thus doubly armed and need fear
neither demons nor men.
Whether I live or whether I die, I have the truth on my side, our struggle is survival and
to fight for our freedom from slavery. What a glory to return in victory from such a
battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! How secure is life when the conscience is
unsullied! How secure, I say, is life when death is anticipated without fear; or rather
when it is desired with feeling and embraced with reverence!
When the battle is at hand, I will arm myself interiorly with faith, truth and confidence,
and exteriorly with steel rather than decorate myself with gold.
I will seek out horses which are strong and swift, rather than those which are brilliant
and well-plumed; I will set my mind on fighting to win rather than on parading for show.
I think not of glory and seek to be formidable rather than decadent.
No matter how outnumbered I am, I will never surrender, for victory in war is not
dependent on a big army, but on the bravery, cleverness and the determination of the
Knight.
In a wondrous and unique manner I will appear gentler than a lamb, yet I will prove to
be fiercer than a lion.
[The Justiciar Knights raises their swords against the candidate. if alone; the candidate places the
sword in such a way that the tip of the sword faces his heart]
All this I most solemnly, sincerely promise and swear, with a firm and steady resolution
to perform the same, without any hesitation, myself, under no less penalty than that of
having my body severed in two, my bowels taken from thence and burned to ashes, the
ashes scattered before the four winds of heaven, that no more remembrance might be
had of so vile and wicked a wretch as I would be, should I ever, knowingly, violate my
obligations. So help me God, and keep me steadfast in the due performance of the same.
This oath I pronounce loudly, and is witnessed by the Knights present, the spirits of my
ancestors, past martyrs and the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. I sign this pledge
and confirm it by my blood.
[If the candidate is alone with no other Justiciar Knights present; he makes a small cut in his finger,
and from the drops of blood (a few drops is sufficient), signs the document, and then burns it using
the flame from the candle.]
[The candidate may rise; for he is now a Justiciar Knight.]

It is clear that Breivik spent considerable time defining the uniform & medals Knights would receive.  The following are but a few out of about 50 medals proposed by Breivik:

All these medals have  purposes for which Breivik provides detailed definition.

  • Distinguished Destroyer of cultural Marxism (DCM) commendation
  •  Distinguished Saboteur Master (SM) commendation
  •  Distinguished Wielder of the Furious Scimitar (WFS) commendation

Fancier medals were available, such as this Red Cross:

“A fallen Justiciar Knight (fallen in the line of duty) is
awarded with the Cross of Martyrdom regardless of the the
outcome of his operation.
Red cross with gold outline.
This breast jewel is awarded for heroic and exceptional
service, through martyrdom, by defending the indigenous
peoples of Europe, European identity, culture, traditions
and European Christendom. Post-mortem award.”

Different swords could be awarded.  Here are descriptions of a few listed:

  • DCM – Gold sword, two gold stars: Participated in an operation where at least 10 international category A traitors or at least 1 category A, European head of state was executed (includes the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa).
  • DCM – Gold sword, one gold star: Participated in an operation where at least 10 national category A traitors were executed
  • DCM – Gold sword: Participated in an operation where at least 1 national category A traitor was executed
  • DCM – Gold sword, two bronze stars: Participated in an operation where an international top 4 primary category A traitor was injured (head of state of either the US, Germany, France or the UK)

Detailed information and photos are provided for the special gravestones of fallen Knights, as are instructions on how to deliver special honors to the fallen Knight’s family.  Special instructions are even given to anticipate the angry rejection of these families.

Detailed descriptions for the formal uniform for the Knight Templar are given from the cut, the tailoring, the white gloves, the braids & even the buttons.  These uniforms are to be worn for the inevitable court appearance of the Knight if they survive their attack on Marxist Europe.   Like the medals & tombstone, a deep history is given for every aspect of the military garb.

  • “A stripped USMC dress blues jacket – dark blue/black (remove buttons and other insignias as we will apply our own)
  • Dark blue/black dress pants
  • Black dress shoes
  • White gloves (preferably leather)
  • A USMC version Sam Browne belt (black)
  • Gold aiguillette, British”

Templar Knight's Court Uniform

Breivik also believes that the Knights Templar will be housed in The Temple of Jerusalem:

“The Temple of Jerusalem (chapter 5)
THEIR QUARTERS indeed are in the very temple of Jerusalem, which is not as vast as the
ancient masterpiece of Solomon, but is no less glorious. Truly all the magnificence of the
first temple lay in perishable gold and silver, in polished stones and precious woods;
whereas all the beauty and gracious charming adornment of its present counterpart is
the religious fervor of its occupants and by their well-disciplined behavior.”

At the end of various parts of the elaborate ritual of becoming a knight, Breivik gives a little insight into the lonely nature of his own initiation:

“You are likely to be alone
when performing the rite so you will not undergo the full magnitude of the experience.
The candidate is normally surrounded by Justiciar Knights under a normal initiation
ceremony.”

It leaves the mind to imagine Breivik, alone with a candle (“made of at least 51% beeswax, the remainder may be paraffin“), a skull and a sword dressed in his full military uniform performing feats such as:

[The candidate kneels in front of the altar, while reading the oath out loudly]

[The Justiciar Knights raises their swords against the candidate. if alone; the candidate places the
sword in such a way that the tip of the sword faces his heart]

[If the candidate is alone with no other Justiciar Knights present; he makes a small cut in his finger,
and from the drops of blood (a few drops is sufficient), signs the document, and then burns it using
the flame from the candle.]

It is when I imagine Breivik doing these things in his home (or barn?) alone that truly signals the enormity of the man’s insanity.

Another indication of his complete insanity is the incredible length of time (eight years) he has dedicated to this new Resistance movement.  He spent four years simply researching his subjects and working to collect millions of NOK (Norwegian Krone) for his purposes.  He spent two years methodically isolating himself, in ‘believable’ ways, from his closest friends & families.  For eight years, he withheld absolutely all information about his intent and actions from a close set of friends that he met often and from a mother & sister that he was very close to.  The picture above indicates that the family members will be absolutely shocked by what he has been thinking and doing for the past eight years.  That is just not normal.  He was not a true loner.   He spent approximately three years to write his book (believable considering its ambitious scope).  He spent his entire 8 years’ salary on this incredibly secret endeavour.  The focus and discipline necessary to accomplish this alone would be tremendous by anyone’s standard.   Only someone utterly convinced in his purpose could do this.  And considering the extent of his fantasy of Knighthood, one must conclude he is utterly insane.

Breivik’s insanity also lies in his deep conviction that he will be allowed to put on a grandiose trial that would demonstrate that he represents the ‘true military of the people’ and that Europe is dominated by Marxists.  He outlines all the statements the Knight on trial should make, how to select a good defense attorney and how to culminate the trial into a devastating mental blow to the Marxists by planting the first seeds of psychological warfare in the population.  He dedicates 9 entire pages on the subject.  An example of his language is as follows:

“You may judge me today, but history will judge you. History will show that you
condemned an innocent here today, a member of the National Resistance Movement.
History will show that you condemned a protector of freedom, a protector of our country,
a protector of our culture, a protector of our identity, a protector of Christendom and a
protector of our people. History will show that you soaked your hands in blood here
today. May my brothers and sisters, all the current and future individual members of the
European Resistance Movements and the rest of the patriots of this country show you
compassion and forgiveness for what you have done here today. I forgive you, because I
truly believe that you do not know what you are doing.”

The last statement is clearly reminiscent of Jesus’s last statement on the cross, thus further indicating Breivik’s martyrdom complex- also his grandiosity.  His last exhortation to current and future Knights is long and tedious, but this fragment will give you an idea of the level of fantasy in which this man lived:

“WHAT, THEN IS THE END OR FRUIT of this worldly knighthood, or rather knavery, as I
should call it? What if not the mortal sin of the victor and the eternal death of the
vanquished? Well then, let me borrow a word from the Apostle and exhort him who
plows, to plow in hope, and him who threshes, to do so in view of some fruit.
What then, O knights, is this monstrous error and what this unbearable urge which bids
you fight with such pomp and labor, and all to no purpose except death and sin? You
cover your horses with silk, and plume your armour with I know not what sort of rags;
you paint your shields and your saddles; you adorn your bits and spurs with gold and
silver and precious stones, and then in all this glory you rush to your ruin with fearful
wrath and fearless folly. Are these the trappings of a warrior or are they not rather the
trinkets of a woman? Do you think the swords of your foes will be turned back by your
gold, spare your jewels or be unable to pierce your silks?”

Breivik’s insanity can also be measured by the incredible extent he believes himself capable of re-defining post Resistance Europe.  In his mind, he is truly great.  He has left nauseatingly detailed  instructions on how to buy & run a farm (to order chemicals and obtain privacy), run a revolution (he includes a course at the end of the third book), what the post resistance government will look like,  the new Crusader Catholic Church’s mission & Papal duties , how the trials & executions of traitors (he labels them as A, B or C types depending on their levels of offense) will be handled, the new Capitalism, how the new public education system will run (sex separated), how science will be conducted (the extension of human life through:

“Developing a brain-computer interface (BCI) which provides a direct path of
communication from an external device to the brain. The goal should be to create an
alternative to educational institutions. Downloading information to the brain more
efficiently can free up 15-30 years of an individual’s life which normally would have been
used for studies. This might take decades to develop and hundreds of billions spent but
imagine how it would revolutionise our world.”)

 Global pollution, population control

(“We should create population capacity guidelines for continents or countries. The
guidelines should be based on a combination of the availability of resources and other
factors in an attempt to limit overpopulation. Every country should abide by these
guidelines.”)

“A future European Federation must
pressure all 2nd and 3rd world countries to pursue this goal. Food aid to 3rd world countries
must stop immediately as it is the primary cause of overpopulation.”

Crime prevention, foreign aid, the new European Federation Anthem

(“The anthem could be a vocal variation of: Lux Aeterna by
Clint Mansell[1], and could be made available on all European languages. The vocal
theme of the song should underline European unity against Jihad and the Islamic
Caliphates in the past and our struggle against Marxism.”)

Foreign policy (South Africa, United States, Israel, India)

“The physical separation (apartheid) of the Israelis and the Muslims works as intended.
The Islamic terrorist attacks have been reduced by 90% since the creation of the physical
barrier.”

“The physical separation (apartheid) of the Indians and the Pakistani Muslims works as
intended. The Islamic terrorist attacks have been reduced significantly since the creation
of this physical barrier.”

“I consider both the former apartheid policies and the current situation as intolerable
scenarios. However, considering the fact that I am a creature of logic and pragmatism the
lesser evil is always the best alternative which is why we know should be done. The
apartheid system was put in place to regulate the multicultural society and manifested
itself through what would resemble the salad bowl that is Los Angeles with segregated
communities. The difference is that the Europeans treated the Africans as second class
citizens. Instead of attempting to co-exist within the borders of the same nation they
should have just divided the country in half to begin with. The apartheid system was a
racist multicultural system and should not be copied. Instead a policy of “Balkanisation”
must be sought where the country is divided in two or more parts and given their own
sovereignty.”

“The fall of the USA will occur by 2030 – the US is dying and will never recover, unless…

To assume that millions and Asian and African immigrants, in addition to existing non-
European minorities, can be assimilated with this homogenous European Christian culture
is a mistake of civilizational proportions and attempting such should be categorized as a
genocidal war crime. As the Asian/African immigration to the US accelerates, the level of
social cohesion rapidly declines and deteriorates, which will eventually cause the
economical system to crash, never to recover to its former highs. The only thing that can
solve problems of this magnitude is a coup d’état initiated by conservatives. A swift coup
d’état is after all preferable to a long term civil war. Regardless of the method, the
outcome will be a re-establishment/re-formation of the European Christian country that
is the US.”

“Had the Democrat Harry S. Truman initiated mass-executions of 100 000 Marxist
Americans in 1945 (alternatively deported them to the Soviet Union) and at the same
time reduced women’s influence in political matters concerning culture and security, there
would never have been a silent 68 cultural Marxist revolution. In addition, he should have
relocated all of the African Americans and other non-European citizens to select states
and given them complete autonomy. As we know, due to the weak and incompetent
leadership of post WW2 administrations – US universities, public institutions, the
Democratic Party and even the Republican Party was infiltrated by cultural Marxists which
lead to the cultural Marxist revolution of 68.”

to descriptions of the future European Independence Day are not below his notice & instruction.  His magnificence knows no bounds.

Breivik’s insane arrogance seems to know no limits in that he also defines the different classes of individuals who will emerge after the Resistance has reached its full zenith.  He understands that European Peoples are above ‘labor’ jobs and generously provides for a ‘servant class’ to emerge:

“Future servant class
It would be logical to use cheap foreign labour especially within the construction sector.
These workers should be given 12 month “focus contracts” and must return to their
country of origin after the term has ended. Focus contracts involve working up to 12
hours per day. These individuals will be offered competitive wages (compared to their
country of origin).
One of the primary arguments for modern mass immigration is to justify the demand for
labour, jobs the indigenous Europeans are unwilling to take. Now, who will take these
jobs when we have halted immigration completely and deported all the Muslims?
The problem with the current model of mass immigration is that every individual,
depending on country, is awarded citizenship within 7 years. The children of these first
generation immigrants are not interested in the jobs the parent generation took so we
have to accept even more immigration to fill in these gaps every two decades. It
develops into a never ending spiral of mass immigration which eventually leads to a
situation where the indigenous people end up as a minority.
The following solution will provide a servant class covering the following professions:
- Cleaning
- Construction work
- Gardening
- Taxis
- Farming/harvesting
6-12 month “focus contracts” will be offered to individuals from Bangladesh, Pakistan and
India (these services may be reserved for Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists
considering our Hostile stance towards the global Islamic Ummah). These will be flown in
in bulk every month and will leave at the end of the contract. During their stay they will
work 12 hours a day for the duration of their contracts (6 or 12 months) and are then
flown back to their homelands. There should be at least a 6 month quarantine period
between every 12 month contract to prevent the individuals from becoming too culturally
attached.
These individuals will live in segregated communities in pre-defined areas of each major
city and must be provided free medical services, free housing in restricted barrack towns
and subsidised food /essentials and subsidised transportation costs. This will allow them
to return with a larger portion of their salary. They will be compensated at a rate
equivalent to 300% of what they would have earned in their country of origin.
F example, if they would have earned 200 Euro per month in Bangladesh they will earn
600 Euro here.
This might sound cynical to especially females…”

Lastly, Breivik interviews himself.  He asks himself questions and then proceeds to answer them toward the end of the third book.  Sometimes he laughs when he answers his own questions- as if he were truly being interviewed by someone else!  “Megalomaniac” doesn’t begin to do justice to Breivik.

5) Breivik is a racist.  Brievik is terrified of being related to Hitler or of being calling racist, which of course, makes one wonder why.  Whether he would or not, his arguments bear striking resemblance to Hitler’s.  1)  someone else is to blame for the current state of affairs 2) he is obsessed with genealogy &  reprogenetics 3) he obsessed with “The rapid extinction of the Nordic genotypes” and uses a study conducted on the rapid disappearance of blue eyes among our population to make his point.  He is terrified of the effects of mixing African & Asian blood with Nordic blood to such an extent that he is not sure the post Resistance Europe will even tolerate mixed individuals to live.  Most of his solutions involve a ‘compassionate’ removal of all offending non-Nordic races from Europe and the building of fences to keep them out.  Again, he is magnanimous (when he is not calling them ‘lazy traitors’ to their ‘origin’ country) concerning all races (other than Muslims) and extends his ‘friendship’ to them in post resistance Europe.  He even describes their expulsion from desirable Europe as a ‘good’ thing for their countries as it forever removes the temptation of European immigration and thus, encourages them to rebuild their own nations.   The following comments illuminate his mindset perfectly:

Due to the fact that I have been exposed to decades of multicultural indoctrination I feel
a need to emphasise that I am not in fact a racist and never have been.

“For the sake of the argument (and knowing that NS’s are obsessed with ethnicity); I’m
100% of Nordic descent and a protestant Christian with no ties to any Jewish
organisation which would cloud my judgement.”

“A century ago, 80 percent of people married within their ethnic group, Grant said. Blue
eyes, a genetically recessive trait, were routinely passed down, especially among people
of English, Irish, and Northern European ancestry.
By mid-century, a person’s level of education — and not ethnicity — became the primary
factor in selecting a spouse. As intermarriage between ethnic groups became the norm,
blue eyes began to disappear, replaced by brown.
The influx of nonwhites into the United States, especially from Latin America and Asia,
hastened the disappearance. Between 1900 and 1950, only about 1 in 10 Americans was
nonwhite. Today that ratio is 1 in 3.”

“Preferences for fair skin and blue eyes stretch back in Europe to at least the Middle Ages,
according to Hema Sundaram , author of “Face Value”, a book about the history of
beauty. For women in particular, especially those of European descent, fair skin and light
eyes have long been seen as indicators of fertility and beauty. “

 “We all remember the horrors from WW2 where the Empire of Japan committed atrocities
against the Chinese by large scale massacres and by using them as human test subjects
for various purposes. Nazi Germany and other countries did the same thing in a smaller
degree and it can’t or shouldn’t be excused. Unfortunately, the horrors of WW2 created a
stigma associated with all future research and advances in the field of reprogenetics and
improving humans biologically by removing negative hereditary factors. Nevertheless, it
is common today for Westerners to abort if it is proved that the fetus has Down’s
syndrome, severe disfigurements (lacking or additional limbs) or other severe physical
handicaps like dwarfism.”

“In any case, we need to get over this taboo as soon as possible because it is estimated
that the Nordic genotypes will be extinct completely within 200 years. This is mainly due
to intermarriage between Nordics and non-Nordics. Multiculturalist doctrines have
speeded this “indirect extermination process” up further in many Western European
countries so the extinction might happen sooner. F example the Norwegian cultural
Marxist government has created a vast network of asylum camps all over the country
(and in historically isolated small towns and villages) which will contribute to accelerate
this process substantially. The Nordic genotypes might be wiped out within 200 years and
yet not a single counter-measure has been employed to prevent this from happening due
to the fact that it is considered politically incorrect.
Realistically there are only three ways to prevent this. One solution will be by introducing
negative eugenics programs combined with ethnic segregation somewhat similar to some
policies of the Third Reich. Segregating Nordics and non-Nordic genotypes at this point
would be almost impossible even if you had military and political carte blanche. Even in
Norway and Sweden the number of individuals with the Nordic genotype is reduced
annually at a drastic rate due to EU open borders program, mass-Asian/African
immigration and significantly higher Asian/African (especially Muslim) birthrates.”

“Reprogenetics, by contrast, would be pursued by individual parents, who would be trying
to improve their children with the same motivations that compel them to purchase
expensive courses in preparation for standardised testing (e.g. the SAT).
Eugenics would have required a continual selection for breeding of the “fit”, and a culling
of the “unfit” while, according to bioethicist James Hughes, universal access to
reprogenetics provided by a welfare state would permit the conversion of all the unfit to
the highest genetic level. However, he shares Silver’s concern that unequal access to
reprogenetics could create a two-tiered society of “GenRich” and “GenPoor”, geneticallyengineered
“haves” and “have nots” (see the film Gattaca for a fictional depiction of the
latter scenario).
The other contrast is that it is now known that the concept of genetic purity through
eugenics is misguided: this form of genetic purity, insofar as it is meaningful, is
effectively inbreeding and results in poor health and infertility while the end result of
reprogenetics on the gene pool would be reduced incidence of genetic disease and
potentially increased genetic IQ.”

Breivik goes on to insist that reprogenetics would eventually prevent war, conflict and the loss of threatened genotypes.

 “As such, introducing and commercialising a World Bank of Genotypes must be considered
a solidarity project, a peace project, which goal is to prevent conflict. It gives anyone
equal right to the banked material. Anyone can choose any preference they want out of
the world’s genotypes. This type of project has the potential to end many conflicts once
and for all, especially many of those related to ethnocentrism. The primary drawback
would be that only the first world would have the financial capability of taking advantage
of it during the first decades.”

He is terrified of mixing the Nordic genes with Asian & African genes:

“We know that the cultural Marxist elites in Western Europe have created an adoption
system which facilitates the adoption of Asians and Africans but makes the adoption of
European babies more or less impossible. Not only are absolutely all European countries
significantly influenced by Marxism (matriarchy leads to low birth rates, while Asia and
Africa still has patriarchy leading to high birth rates) but it would seem like there is a
deliberate agenda of attempting to genetically dilute our tribe by systematical facilitation
of adoption from Asia and Africa.”

 “Because 90% of Europeans choose to follow
their instincts, camouflaging their true feelings in order to survive in this Marxist world.
Then we have the 10% Europeans, women and men, who choose to fully embrace the
Marxist rule of procreating with Asians and Africans. What will happen to them and their
offspring when we reach phase 2 or 3 of the European civil war is unknown.  It is not
unlikely that they may be labeled as traitors as large parts of the population.”

“The preservation of your ethnic affiliation is likely to be the greatest gift you can ever
bestow upon your offspring as it will ensure their survival the next 70 years. Being hip,
by mimicking Madonna or Angelina may be fatal to your offspring. Because I can
guarantee the following; the European civil war has barely begun, and what is politically
correct today, is likely to be seen as an absurdity during times of great hardship.
So think long term, be smart and never consider abandoning the ethnic affiliation to your
tribe. If you do, it is a chance that you will end up making a decision that can prove to be
fatal for yourself or for your children.”

 “Social-darwinism was the norm before the 1950. Back then, it
was allowed to say what we feel. Now, however, we have to disguise our preferences to
avoid the horrible consequences of being labeled as a genetical preferentialist.”

 “Europe should never encourage or facilitate the African (or Asian) cowards and traitors
whom attempt to abandon their people and their own struggle and conflict. Rewarding
cowardice will only establish a destructive precedence which will result in a cultivation of
the coward’s mentality. This short sighted bleeding heart policy is one of several
important causes for both Africa’s and Europe’s problems.”

Interestingly enough, while he continues to state a myriad of statistics on Blacks, Latinos & Jews (and none for Asians), he throws the Asians into every conclusion he arrives at nonetheless- a perfect example of Breivik’s inability to see his own contradictions.  Also, a perfect revelation of his racism.  Reading through this portion of his third book is exhausting in its endlessly mindless and contradictory rational to prove why Breivik’s desires for mass deportation and permanent segregation of all ethnicities from pure Nordic blood is actually ‘good’ for the ethnicities involved.  He rotates, at lightning speed, between aggravation toward the ‘inferior’ minorities to generosity in offering them such wonderful solutions to their homelands (by denying them the ‘promise’ of Europe forever, they will be more patriotic to their own homelands and thus contribute to it more positively).  Let us not forget the generous ‘servant class’ status he is also willing to bring about in Europe for those minorities!

6)  Breivik has a deep need to be known- to express himself.  In some ways, this expression comes in pitiful forms, like when he describes himself as ‘charming’, ‘physically fit’,  ‘laid back’, ‘easy going’ and one point said he was “very happy with my physical appearance.”

Some of his more immature, braggartly statements made me blush for him:

“For several years I was
one of the most notable “hip-hop’ers” from Oslo’s West side.”

“Around 1993 and 1994, at 15, I was the most active tagger (grafitti artist)
in Oslo as several people in the old school hip-hop
community can attest to….The fact that hundreds
of kids our own age all over Oslo West and even Oslo East
looked up to us was one of the driving forces I guess”.

But the preponderance of his need to express himself takes the form of extreme violence & terrorism.  Even in this area, he is magnanimous:

“So let there be no doubt whatsoever; I would
be the first person to pull the trigger, given the opportunity, if I ever saw a Jewish
category A or B traitor. But I will not kill him because he is a Jew, but rather because he
is guilty of indirect/direct atrocities against Europeans just like every other cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist category A and B traitor. It’s essential to judge each person
individually in this regard and not according to their DNA structure.”

He is clear that terrorist methods of attacking the civilian population are absolutely legitimate in his eyes due to pure mathematics of the situation.  He gives charts that project what he claims are current statistics of rapes, assaults & deaths of Europeans at the hands of the current population levels of the Muslims in Europe.  He extrapolates the rate of birth by Muslim women to anticipate the future population of Muslims.  Together, he predicts the numbers of these crimes and compares them to the number of people likely to die in small-scale nuclear attacks, biological attacks or conventional attacks.  As the numbers are larger from Muslims, he feels it is a ‘better deal’ for the innocent Europeans to die for the cause of liberation (though they weren’t aware of this when they died or got cancer).  He dedicates no less than 253 pages to combat gear, anti detection methods (both computer and physical), chemical acquisitions, weapon acquisition, bomb building, target acquisition, lists of nuclear power plants, assault plans for nuclear power plants, building & exploding ‘dirty’ bombs, nuclear material acquisition, possible alliances with other criminal & terrorist organizations (ironically, even the possibility of collaboration with Al Qeda (the enemy of my enemy), and medications to survive radiation exposure long enough to complete a nuclear terrorist attack in busy, down town locations.  The details in this section go on ad nauseum and will not be reviewed in this article.  Only with the tightest grip of self-control can anyone possibly peruse this compilation of information so, unfortunately, available on Google.  My wish would be that this document could be destroyed if only to make it harder for other terrorist organizations to get so much destructive information in one fell swoop.   The most frightening part of the compilation is the seemingly candid assertion that there are about 12 other individuals involved in this Resistance movement.

“The European Military Order and Criminal Tribunal (the PCCTS -
Knights Templar) was created by and for the free indigenous
peoples of Europe. One of the primary purposes of the tribunal and
order is to attempt/contribute to seize political and military control
of Western European multiculturalist regimes and to try, judge and
punish Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist
perpetrators (category A, B and C traitors) for crimes committed
against the indigenous peoples of Europe from 1955 until this day.
Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici – PCCTS (the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of
Christ and of the Temple of Solomon), the Knights Templar was re-founded in London in
2002 by representatives from eight European countries, for the purpose of serving the
interests of the free indigenous peoples of Europe and to fight against the ongoing
European Jihad (referred to as the “third Jihad”). The Knights Templar was re-founded as
a pan-European nationalist military order and a military/criminal tribunal with two
primary objectives. The order is to serve as an armed Indigenous Rights Organisation
and as a Crusader Movement (anti-Jihad movement).
The founding session (two meetings consisting of 4 founding members and host as a
security precaution) was held in London, United Kingdom – Apr, 2002.
Founding (re-founding) members:
Anonymous 1 – Nationality: English Protestant (Host)
Anonymous 2 – Nationality: English Christian atheist
Anonymous 3 – Nationality: French Catholic
Anonymous 4 – Nationality: German Christian atheist
Anonymous 5 – Nationality: Dutch Christian agnostic
Anonymous 6 – Nationality: Greek Orthodox
Anonymous 7 – Nationality: Russian Christian atheist
Anonymous 8 – Nationality: Norwegian Protestant (member and proxy for 9)
Anonymous 9 – Nationality: Serbian Orthodox (by proxy, location: Monrovia, Liberia)
Unable to attend:
Anonymous 10 – Nationality: Swedish
Anonymous 11 – Nationality: Belgian
Anonymous 12 – Nationality: European-American”

Let us hope & pray that he is a manipulative liar, as most sociopaths are, as he also claims to have worked completely alone in this latest attack (as noted in his question & answer session with himself).  As he managed to lie successfully for eight entire years to close family & friends, let us hope that this portion of his manifesto is pure bravado and an attempt to terrorise the population & authorities.

Concerning justification for the use of terrorism, Breivik mostly uses the argument, “You are all too brainwashed to know what is good for you, so I must decide.:

“As a Justiciar Knight you are operating as a jury, judge and executioner on behalf of all
free Europeans. Never forget that it is not only your right to act against the tyranny of
the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Europe, it is your duty to do so.
There are situations in which cruelty is necessary, and refusing to apply necessary cruelty
is a betrayal of the people whom you wish to protect.”

 “Some innocent will die in our
operations as they are simply at the wrong place at the wrong time. Get used the idea.
The needs of the many will always surpass the needs of the few.”

“Scores of the people we want to
save from the ongoing European genocide do
not want our help (or at least, believe they do
not want our help).”

“In order to wake up the masses, the only rational approach will be to make sure the
current system implodes. This will cause a lot of short term pain; cut in welfare payouts,
increased unemployment even starvation in extreme cases. The bulk of our people will
refuse to join resistance movements because they feel they have too much to lose. They
have invested several years and a lot of resources in long educations and most people
have mortgages/loans which they have no choice but to attend to. Many receive
exceptional government incentives to stay “loyal” to the system. All of these
responsibilities and incentives cause a symbiosis between the victims (people) and the
exterminator (regime) to a degree where we have a collective mass-scale “Stockholm
syndrome” (sympathies and loyalty to captor). Our objective is to break these bonds and
this can only be achieved through contributing to creating a scenario where the anti-
European hate ideology we wish to destroy perishes/implodes or dies from a thousand
cuts. For every successful operation a new cut is applied and will contribute to this
ideology’s demise. Wiping out Marxism in Europe will take us 30-70 years but we will
succeed eventually. Every effort counts, have no doubt about that.
As the system weakens gradually, the unemployment rate will rise and people will suffer
short term. However, this is the only way we can create a situation where people will
actually stand up for their opinions. We must break their symbiosis to their captor and
many of the people we are trying to liberate will hate us for it. Nevertheless, it is the only
way to destroy cultural Marxism in Western Europe and secure freedom to all Europeans.”

7)  Breivik appears to have sexual dysfunction.  He mentions his own homosexuality twice in the book- once, when saying his friends thought he was homosexual (which he vehemently denies) and again when describing how the ‘ matriarchy’ within his own family had ‘effeminized’ him.

“I do not approve of the super-liberal, matriarchal upbringing though as it
completely lacked discipline and has contributed to feminise me to a certain degree.”

 The theme of Marxism & its espousal of matriarchy & homosexuality as a direct assault on heterosexual men (both directly and indirectly, in that hyper-feminist women are no longer attractive to ‘normal’ heterosexual men) is a constant theme throughout the book.  On the one side Breivik states that,

“The truth of the matter is that I
personally know several gay individuals and have known several gay people during the
years and I don’t have any reservations against them.”

and on the other, he says,

“As a grand scheme intended to deny the intrinsic worth of native Christian European,
heterosexual males, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School opened the door to the
racial and sexual antagonisms of the Trotskyites. Many believed that oppressed Muslims,
non European minorities and others like Feminists and Homosexuals could be the
vanguard of a communist revolution in Europe.”

and,

“The patriarchal social structure would be replaced with matriarchy; the belief that men
and women are different and properly have different roles would be replaced with
androgyny; and the belief that heterosexuality is normal would be replaced with the
belief that homosexuality is equally “normal.”

and,

“Glorification of homosexuality should be shunned” , and “that most cases of AIDS are voluntary, i.e., acquired from immoral sexual acts.”

among many, many other negative references.

Breivik’s constant theme of rape makes me wonder if he, himself, has been raped- but this is pure speculation on my part.  It might, however, answer the question of why he contains such rage toward Muslims.  He frequently mentions the rape of Nordic women by Muslims.  He states that these rapes are never admitted (my emphasis) due to the social anathema associated with sex with Muslims.  In another portion of the books, he writes,

“Dozens of boys and girls have been systematically abused, intimidated and molested
by a group of older boys in the Utrecht neighbourhood of Overvecht. Children aged 8, 9
and 10 have been dragged into bushes and coerced into performing sexual acts on boys
a few years older. Most of the children involved are of Moroccan background.”

 In one portion of the third book, Breivik exhorts his new recruits to avoid detection of their military planning operations:

  • “Say you play WoW (World of Warcraft) or another MMO and have developed an addiction
    for it. Say that are going to play hardcore for the rest of the year and it is no point trying to
    convince you otherwise. Inform them that you will be busy doing that in the future etc. Tell
    them that you are ashamed of it and you don’t want to talk any more about it. Make them
    swear to not tell anyone! (you just effectively prevented any more questions from that
    person AND made the individual assist you in protecting your cover from everyone else)
  • Say you think you are gay and are in the process of discovering your new self and that you
    don’t want to talk any more about this issue. Tell them that you are ashamed of it and you
    don’t want to talk any more about it. Make them swear to not tell anyone! (your ego is
    likely to take a dent unless you are secure in your own heterosexuality, because they will
    actually believe you are gay. However, it’s an extremely effective strategy for stopping
    questions and prevent people from digging in your life when you don’t want them to.”

Interestingly, he admits that he actually does the first item- with much pleasure.  It leaves open the question of the truthfulness of the second.  He mentions, at least twice, his preoccupation with being labeled as a pedophile:

Comment: Normally I find it quite pathetic to brag about how much one has earned. The
only reason I mentioned it is because the cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist government
will likely try to attempt to “assassinate my character” by labelling me as an “insane,
inbred, pedophile Nazi loser”

His thoughts concerning women are a strange mix of disinterest, chivalry and a need to repress & kill:

 “Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should still hold doors open for ladies.”

“War isn’t pretty. It never has been. It is essential to know that approximately 60-70% of
all cultural Marxists or suicidal humanist are female and up to 20% of police officers and
military personnel (system protectors). Being a Justiciar Knight will involve killing our
targets, or any system protector trying to stop us, indiscriminately. You will face women
in battle and they will not hesitate to kill you. To them, you are just another armed
criminal nut case as they will not know your true political agenda until after you have
been slain or are apprehended. If you hesitate as much as a second due to the fact that
your opponent is female you will fail. You must therefore embrace and familiarise yourself
with the concept of killing women, even very attractive women

If you are unwilling or incapable of killing women due to the principles of chivalry you
should probably steer away completely from the armed resistance movements and
should probably consider creating yet another right wing blog instead.

On a personal level though; had it been up to me, women would not be encouraged to
become system protectors at all – police officers nor military personnel. Females on
average (of course; there are always exceptions) are physically and mentally inferior
(aprox 20-30%) on a field of battle. I am not comfortable with the concept of killing
females as they are simply too valuable (emphasis mine, not Breivik’s) to be put in harm’s way. However, we have little
choice under the current regimes as they are encouraged and even positively
discriminated against when applying to become system protectors in many countries.
In any case, all armed resistance fighters really have no choice but to get used to the
idea.”

Breivik is very concerned about the low birthrates of Western women and with the high birthrates of the Muslim population.  That explains why he refers to women in the above passage as, “too valuable” to kill.  Note that he didn’t say because they were worth preserving for their own sake.  There is no palpable attraction from Breivik toward any woman in his entire 1500 page manifesto.  While he advocates Chivalry (in this one quote only) toward women, he spends more time on descriptions of how 60% of the Marxist multiculturalists are women who need to be killed.  His attacks on hyper-feminist women reign supreme in his books.

Lastly, his obsession with his physical appearance causes one to wonder at his sexuality.  He recommends that all Knights, before their possibly suicidal attacks on European targets, should have professional photos taken of themselves.  He seems to worry that his preoccupation will be interpreted as ‘gay’ and attempts to use humor to dispel the notion.  The purpose of  the photography was to ‘market’ and package the new Resistance Movement to future recruits.  He also recommended that, before any mission, the Knights should throw away or delete any unflattering images of themselves as it was assured that the followup raid on their homes would result in the Marxist Establishment’s publication of the ‘most retarded’ photos of you they can find.  Here are some tips for photography Breivik gives:

  • “Use professional makeup artists and use make up on both female and male models.
    Yes, this sounds gay, but looking “attractive” will significantly benefit the
    impact of our message as it will act as a force multiplier
  • Take a few hours in a solarium to look fresher 
  • Cut your hair shave
  • Train hard (work out) at least 7 days prior to photo session
  • Visit a male salon if possible and apply light makeup. Yes, I know – this might sound
    repulsive to big badass warriors like us, but we must look our best for the shoot
  • Use your best clothing – you can f example bring 3 different sets of clothing to the shot
    location – 1. Dress, tie etc. 2. Casual wear 3. Sporty wear 4. Militaristic wear (obviously,
    you can’t bring your guns or anything indicating that you are a resistance fighter)
  • Use professional editing (photoshop) on all digital photos.”

This explains the rather effeminate photos of Breivik that surfaced almost immediately upon his capture.

One part of the book is dedicated to how Marxism uses sexual degradation to further the breakdown of patriarchy.  He criticizes his friends & family for their promiscuity, but while doing so brags about  his physical appearance and sexual desirability:

“All five have had more than 300 sexual partners (two of them more than 700) and
I know for a fact that three of them have one or more STDs (probably all of them). I
have several other promiscuous (slut) friends and I could list at least 30 male and
females in my social environment if I wanted to. I don’t blame them personally and it has
absolutely nothing to do with envy. I could easily have chosen the same path if I wanted
to, due to my looks, status, resourcefulness and charm”.

He repeats this claim several times throughout his book, which leaves one to wonder at his level of sexual security.  Personally, I derived a deep sexual insecurity from Breivik on many levels.  He feels effeminate, which he hates.  This femininity worries him in that it might mean he is homosexual.  Perhaps he is homosexual and has had homosexual relationships.  He clearly does not approve of the homosexual lifestyle and this inner doubt might explain his need for a fantasy world where he is the ultimate, masculine man.  He blames his effeminate nature on both his mother and the Marxist Muslim culture around him.  Women are not interesting to him, he claims, because they have become militant and hyper feminist.  He feels that women, in this new Marxist reality, are now his masters and that he has been made into their slaves.  This again points toward sexual insecurity.  In response, he becomes hyper masculine- he works out obsessively, he becomes an expert in war, weapons, strategy and in his own mind, a great Knight in the style of Lancelot.  It is in his fantasy world that he finds the masculinity that is so lacking in his real life.

It is clear that Breivik was sexually unsure of himself.  Interestingly enough, this statement came from Breivik interviewing Breivik at the end of the third book.  He never mentions a relationship with any woman, but mentions sexual escapades described as ‘blow jobs’ behind dark bars.  The sex of his partner is not mentioned.  Another extremely disturbing part of the book is when Breivik was describing how one could ‘authenticate’ the identity of a ‘true’ Knight of the Templar.

 “A Justiciar Knight is willing to martyr himself for the cause while a EU/US agent will not be
willing to sacrifice much. The entity should demand that the alleged Justiciar Knight in
question surgically remove his penis and testicles and/or execute a fixed number of
civilian children. “

His focus on the removal of his penis seems to point to a deep hatred of that part of his body.  To conclude, the evidence seems to point both to homosexual tendencies as well as feelings of sexual impotence or insecurity.  Either way, it explains his need to be the hyper masculine ultimate fighting machine- the Modern Knight.

II.  Basic layout

Anders split his compendium into three books.  The first two books provide a very scholarly description of how multiculturalism (the idea that people of different cultures, ideologies, languages, etc can live together in a country, side by side, without any necessary integration into the greater national identity.   An analogy used to illustrate this concept is to think about America’s concept of a melting pot.  Many cultures came here, but we all ‘melt’ together into one national identity:  that of being an American.  Multiculturalism is better contrasted to a salad bowl, where each vegetable is unique and completely separate from the others, but can be enjoyed as a single dish.) is, in fact, nothing more than the most recent manifestation of Marxism.  When reading these first two books, you will be struck at the intelligent & scholarly ‘voice’ with which they are written.  But do not be fooled.  These two books are almost completely other writers’ (bloggers’) works.  He has cut and pasted from several sources- the most prominent one being a blogger named  Fjordman at http://fjordman.blogspot.com/ whom he admires greatly.

On closer inspection, you will notice that he actually credits these works.  None of these works advocate any form of violence.  Anders makes it clear that the lack of military resistance in these writers’ works annoys him.  He feels motivated to take up the task for them- and for all of Europe.

“The reason why authors on the Eurabia related issues/Islamisation of Europe – Fjordman,
Spencer, Ye’or, Bostom etc. aren’t actively discussing deportation is because the method
is considered too extreme (and thus would damage their reputational shields). This would
un-doubtfully undermine their work and probably disallowing them to publish any future
books. However, the warning about Islam has been repeated for more than two decades
and it is apparent that 40 more years of dialogue, without action, would have a
devastating effect on Europe. If these authors are to scared to propagate a conservative
revolution and armed resistance then other authors will have to.”

Neither of these two books are worth reading unless you are interested in the geopolitical struggle in Europe over Muslim immigration policies.  While Breivik, himself, adds commentary after the articles he has stolen, almost all his true motivation & thoughts are in the third book.  One point worth noting, however, is that Breivik leaves all the intellectual reasoning behind in the first two books.  The third book, Breivik’s book, simply describes the full amount violence (and the delivery methods of that violence) he wishes to unleash on his enemies.  It is the third book where he reveals his insanity & deep racism.  It becomes crystal clear that Breivik is completely unconcerned with the intellectual ideas surrounding the Marxist incarnation of multiculturalism.  He is only concerned with his own magnificence & violence.  The first two books are convenient justification for his need to kill.

Breivik gives a full biology of his life in the third book.  He describes running with a graffiti, hip-hop gang in the midst of frighteningly aggressive Islamic gangs on the streets of Oslo.  He describes the many rapes of Nordic women by Muslim gangs (he claims to have witnessed 50) that went unpunished by the Marxist government while the smallest grievance of a skin head group led to stiff prison time & beatings by the police.  He describes the systematic assaults on Norwegian youngsters by Islamic gangs as well as their sanctioned thievery of Norwegian stores (a form of collecting tithe).  As time proceeded through his teenager life, he became disenfranchised with the ‘leftist’ gang he was in as they tolerated the Muslim behavior he had come to hate.  His exposure to the many Muslims in Norway, along with his personal experiences turned him from a leftist, ignorant ideology to a cultural conservative.  He began to admire the ‘peaceful’ skin heads and wondered at how well-behaved they were in school.   His natural curiosity, he claims, led him to the  The European Military Order and Criminal Tribunal [Poor Fellow-Soldiers of  Christ and of the Temple of Solomon ( PCCTS)] .  His somewhat contrary statements give some hope that he is not actually part of a larger group of individuals as he claims at one point in the book.  On the one hand, he claims to be a founding member of the group.  On the other, he implies that he gained admission to the group.  One can only hope that either he is a liar or that he did meet in 2002 with the stated individuals and was the only one to have taken their discussions of Knighthood seriously.  Perhaps only Breivik held the mental instability to not only talk about a grand Knighthood that could save Europe from Marxism, but to carry it out in deadly fashion.  Perhaps the people he met  were some of the people he spoke of as fellow players in his fantasy oriented interactive computer game.  Perhaps, to them, they were just playing either imagination games in parallel to real life or were actually simply discussing the game.  It boggles the mind to think that twelve people could be simultaneously so mentally unstable as to believe in Breivik’s fantasies of Knighthood.  One can only hope.

Breivik also posts a diary that frighteningly details every step he took to build his bombs and to plan his attack.  Police investigations will be interested in this part as many details of his actions are given.  In addition, his bizarre use of ‘happy face icons’  and ‘lols’ from time to time will give the reader the level of insanity under which this man operated.

Breivik also lists incredibly personal information concerning STD’s of his mother & family.  He reveals information about their personal finances.  His reasoning is that it is necessary in order to illustrate his points, but it is obvious that he is actually revenging himself on them.

III. Final Conclusion

Breivik felt powerless for many years of his life.  He felt emasculated and unfulfilled.  Whether or not he is legally insane remains to be seen in the court of law, but it is completely clear that he is a completely insane sociopath.  He turned outward in his rage.  He blamed others- women & Muslims.  He is empty of soul & compassion in his retribution plans.  He understands somewhere deep inside that he requires a better justification for his actions and simply jumps on the back of the most relevant social political issue of Norway:  immigration.  In his deep fantasy where he is the grand champion of the world, a literal Knight in white armour, he alights on the concept of a powerful papal Church that can force all people, with the full approval of God, to bend to his will.  Women will be forced, both physically & spiritually, by God to submit to him and Muslims will be killed through rightful, ordained Crusades.  I believe the Knight concept was born from his immersion in his favorite fantasy computer game he played obsessively for many years.  I don’t believe that there are any other Knights Templar and that any meeting that may have occurred between him & other people had nothing to do with his insane conclusions of revenge.  He noted that he played his fantasy game with people from around the globe and that their interactions online could get quite involved.  I truly wonder if this was the real reason behind any get-togethers that took place.  Police investigations will reveal more about this aspect in time.  But as Breivik has shown himself to be a sociopathic liar for eight years to close friends & family, I can’t help but believe that like anyone threatening another, he is simply trying to bolster his position by saying, “There are LOTS of people who are behind me.  You’ll see, they’ll come soon and THEN you’ll be sorry.”

Having read the entire monstrosity of this 1500 page manifesto, I can’t help but shake my head.  The guy is certifiably insane.  I realize that will rankle many people who think that prison is the right place for Breivik.  All I can say is that I am not making any kind of legal statement when I say he is insane.  That will all be up to the courts.  But his words & mind roll around in my head and believe me, this guy is nuts.

About these ads

Latest Comments

  1. Chillingworth says:

    Wow.

    Seriously, thank you for reading the “manifesto” so we don’t have to. I appreciated the Reformed Pastor’s analysis, which was the first I’d heard that Breivik had explicitly said that he wasn’t a “religious Christian”, but yours is the first I’d heard that Breivik identified with Christianity for the express purpose of giving his cause the broadest possible appeal.

    “Lastly, his obsession with his physical appearance causes one to wonder at his sexuality. He recommends that all Knights, before their possibly suicidal attacks on European targets, should have professional photos taken of themselves. He seems to worry that his preoccupation will be interpreted as ‘gay’ and attempts to use humor to dispel the notion.”

    Then I find that humorous, but not the way he intended!

  2. Anonymous says:

    First off, let me start by saying that Breivik certainly lost touch with reality…., of that I’m sure we all can agree. Whether he is sane or not will be a case for the psychologists and courts to decide.

    I enjoyed your opinions of his compendium and know that it was probably a hardship on your family as you toiled with this analysis. Although I read a large part of the manuscript I certainly could not get through the whole thing as it was just too viscous to read (especially the information about Islam: its past, present, and future!). I’ve never read your web log before but after perusing this article and your site I felt compelled to make a number of responses.

    One of the things that occurred to me was the innate need of educated people to distance themselves from the writings of historical figures whose actions were considered mad or controversial at the time: Breivik is an example of this. For instance, you basically left me feeling like the information contained in the first two books was superfluous due to the fact that he was obviously a madman, when in fact the opposite is true. The information mentioned in those books covered Social Marxism vs. Cultural Marxism, the Muslim immigration in Europe and the resentment of that by native individuals, and the threat of Islam, was quite detailed and presented with historical fact and documentation in each area e.g. the Frankfurt School and its activities concerning Cultural Marxism both in Europe and the USA, and the writings of the Quran, the Sunnah, and the Hadith’s, etc.

    Another example of this distancing need is the Mien Kampf, which if I remember correctly was written in a three year period that the writer was in prison, and which most western commentators describes as maniacal and insane, but in effect is a look into the mind of the defeated German people and who they placed blame on for their current status in history. Hitler could have never made it to power if these ideologies were not present in the average man, so Mien Kampf should be considered a powerful work of historical beliefs. Of course, no humanistic individual would ever agree with that despot and his “master plan”, but that does not rule out that some of his observations were correct. The point I am making is that Breivik, Kaczynski, Hitler, Oswald, etc. all held certain beliefs and wrote some things that were both correct and relevant (some still today), and accepting this in no way aligns us with their actions or should portray us as agreeing with their other dangerous precepts. When a writer fears this and writes as such they come off as biased and one sided.

    You also seem to imply that he plagiarized the material when in fact he noted in the very beginning of the compendium that this was just a draft, that he was not a writer as such, and that others who supported the “cause” should take up the manuscript and further define it (which includes proper citing of references and other items which support journalistic integrity). As detailed as he was in the technical aspects of his “mission”, he seemed to become bored with the compendium and just hobbled references and footnotes in. And it’s not a case of just “cut and paste” as he does make comments from time to time. But I do agree with you that the third book certainly gives us an open window into his mind and just how far from our reality he had travelled.

    I was particularly interested in his meticulously defined Templar Knights as you noted in your analysis. Anyone who has joined in role playing games (RPG’s) will immediately see the correlation between the in depth descriptions of characters and definitions on the limits of skills, etc. and Breivik’s painstakingly constructed Justicair Knighthood. Personally I have had moderate experience with RPG’s, but distinctly remember the uproar about Dungeons and Dragons (D&D) in the late 70’s and early 80’s. As with World of Warcraft (WOW) which Breivik took a year off to play daily (which for hard core users means 12+ hours a day), D&D spawned its own set of crazy individuals that ended in murder and other crimes as the player’s fantasy worlds collided with the real world around them. I assume you have very little experience with RPG’s and therefore probably cannot understand how immersing yourself in these fantasy games can send you spiraling off into a virtual reality…, especially if drugs are involved (even mundane ones such as marijuana). I personally have watched a couple of friend’s kind of “lose it” for a while, and it surprises me that more people haven’t snapped. Considering there are literally 10’s of millions of WOW players, its amazing just Breivik lost it. Now if someone has a mental issue such as schizophrenia or manic depression, etc. watch out!! RPG’s will probably be the launching pad for their own undoing.

    Then there’s the homosexual angle that you played. This is a standard from women on message boards across the country. A good example would be AskMendot com: there we can see women who, confronted with information contrary to their statements, immediately lash out against men’s sexual status with statements concerning their effeminacy or latent homosexuality. Like you mention in your explanation of why Liberals choose to run instead of stay and fight (debate an issue), women often choose to play the “homo” card instead of debate honestly. Now I’m not insinuating that you do this, I’m just making a point that this is a common thing and when you diagnose Breivik as a closet homosexual then you come off as boorish or dropping to the least common denominator. One only needs to look at the comments from female writers about the Oswald’s, and Kaczynski’s of this world and you will see a trend there.

    I have seen many men who seem homosexual but who were in fact completely heterosexual and had no history of homosexual interactions in their lives. It is quite reasonable to assume that Breivik’s madness was not a response to self hatred due to homosexual inconsistencies in his life, but was due to his alignment with the other fanatics who spread the information of European revolution from the current state of affairs across the internet.

    And finally, there is the question of the European Resistance Movement itself(ERM). Just because Breivik defined a meticulous and most certainly imaginary modern army of knights, does not mean that the ERM does not exist. In America today there are several movements both public and underground that resist the authoritarian state and preach an overthrow of the current government…, and most times these are violent ideologies. The militias reported in the papers are a good example. So most certainly these same groups exist in Europe and were the seed from which Breivik sprung. I do agree with you that his Templar Knights do not exist, but as far as the ERM I would bet money he was messaging with those individuals for quite a while.

    I would like to end by saying that my heart goes out to those families who lost loved ones and Norway itself. I wish the police would have just shot him as I think this would have lessened the hurt to everyone, including Breivik’s own family.

    And thank you Shannon for taking the time to post your thoughts.

    • short little rebel says:

      Hi Anonymous,

      Thanks for your reply. It seems that you truly take an interest in the Oslo shootings and I appreciate you taking the time to read my analysis. I think, however, that you might have misunderstood some of my thoughts. I would like to clarify.

      If you read through my article carefully, you will see that I don’t discount the information in the first two books. In fact, that information is absolutely relevant to Norway and the EU at this time. It is, indeed, a huge socio-cultural- political movement at this time. My point was NOT that this information was irrelevant, but that it was mostly irrelevant to Breivik. While he put a few comments here & there, he really didn’t bother writing anything about the larger movement- all his effort was in the payback everyone would receive. My point was that Breivik is insane & full of rage & a need to kill. This movement (a very real one) was simply something he piggy backed on. If the movement was something else, he would have piggy backed his ’cause on it. His need is to be a martyr & save the world. He, like Hannibal Lector, needed to transcend the unhappiness of his ordinary real life and become something beautiful & larger than life. I don’t believe he cared about the greater cause except that it served to support his disgust with any creature that was not like his new, magnificent self. (racism)

      As for the larger issue of immigration & Marxism, I stated in my article that when I read these first two books, I was astounded at the logic & intellectualism. I agree with much of those books- but they weren’t written by Breivik! Also, there appears to be much in his books that he did plagiarize- sometimes he gave credit, other times he didn’t. But this is a minor point.

      I don’t think I ‘played’ a homosexual angle. Breivik’s obsession with feminism was mentioned 212 times in the three book compendium. He mentioned the feminisation (his spelling) of European men 22 times in his third book and mentioned himself in homosexual terms twice. I didn’t say he was homosexual. I said he had sexual dysfunction. His obsession with sexuality & male/female roles is what led me to conclude that he was unsettled in the matter. Also, I never said his confusion in this area led to his attacks. However, some of his anger was absolutely due to his sense of feeling feminine- and he blamed women & Marxism for it. His obsession with the Medieval church can be based on this insecurity as well- the old church believed in the supremacy of the male. That fit his inner dialog very well, indeed.

      As for any real resistance, I have no doubt they exist. My point is only that Breivik wasn’t a part of that. He was serving only his inner needs & fantasies. He just used that movement as his excuse to carry out his need for violence.

      I can promise you that I have no need to distance myself from any geopolitical issue of the day. I made my conclusion of insanity reluctantly. But having read the whole manuscript, I couldn’t help but make that conclusion.

      • Ken says:

        Hi Shannon,
        Thank you very much for taking the time to respond and for your clarifications. Although we are at odds concerning our opinions of Breivik and his motivations, I know we are both agreed that he is certainly mad and I will be keeping a close eye on the legal proceedings to see if he really gets to voice his anti-Muslim/Cultural Marxism agenda, or if he’s just put away as a lunatic. I expect the latter will be the case.

        Sincerely,
        Ken J

      • short little rebel says:

        Sure, no problem. No matter how it turns out, it is certain that there IS a huge problem with Islam in that it is expansionist in nature and that it advocates violence to spread itself. The larger issue, however, is not Islam- it is Progressivism (some will call this the modern version of Marxism). I just think that Progressivism is more evil than Marxism although it uses the exact same methodology to bring itself about- the first two books of Breivik’s compendium outline these methods very well. The progressives are simply using Islam as an excuse to overturn the Constitution as the basis for law (to make us more ‘secure’) and as a means to ultimately create a one world government via larger, more centralized ‘unions’ like the European union. Next will be the American Union and from there, they want total domination. They need to be opposed and stopped.

      • Jono says:

        hi thanks a lot for this writeup, some of the best ive seen on this horrible book, which i also have read… great job!

      • short little rebel says:

        Thanks, Jono! Yeah, you have to read the whole thing to really understand this guy. I really hated to say that I thought he was insane. But I think he is. The authorities need to read it more closely and stop giving him what he wants.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I certainly would not consider Breivik insane although I would suggest he exhibits symptoms akin to Aspbergers.

  4. Michael Thomsen says:

    I have been reading the manifest to and for me it is absolutely clear that he is not insane og there should be anything wrong with his brain or what so ever.

    Its all about politics, power and so on. He is just attacking the ones who is in power. He dont like there politics.

    To blast bombs and kill young people have been done thousands of time in history and also by the ones he calls: culture marxists.

    • short little rebel says:

      Well, I presented my case for insanity and stand by it. No need to say it again. It wasn’t his killing of people that makes me say he was insane. You will just have to read that part more closely to see why I think he is insane.

  5. Michael Thomsen says:

    You say: “He never mentions a relationship with any woman”

    Its not true. See page 1425 : “I did screw two girls in Prague though”.

    And what have sex to do with a political manifest?!

    • short little rebel says:

      How do you figure a document that outlines a Knighthood order in excruciating detail (uniforms, medals, buttons, swords, gravestones, knighthood ceremony, officer names & roles, etc) is a political manifesto? As for the sex, I will check that. But he clearly is obsesses with the feminization of men and homosexuality. He is also a sociopathic liar.

Let me know what you think- but all comments are monitored. If you are leaving a nasty, unhelpful comment, it will never see the light of day.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s