Posts Tagged ‘constitution’

Et tu, Brute!

Et tu, Brute!

Friends, we can not lean on our own understanding as these tyrannical days approach. The reality is that the Progressive takeover is a WORLD EVENT, not an American event. There IS no where to really flee- the whole world is in the same boat. What has been done can no longer be undone. Only God will save us now. God and an inner fierceness to NOT be ruled. To die rather than be subjugated. For the ruler is most definitely coming. And he has evil generals under his thumb. And they WILL demand our loyalty. They will.

It is becoming extremely clear WHY governments have been WISHING to register as many people as possible onto some sort of government ‘help’. Everything from section 8 housing, to drugs you need to stay alive, to social security benefits. The idea is: everyone needs to depend on the gov. for CRITICAL benefits. Their lives literally depend on it at that moment. They have built lives around it. We have TRUSTED them with our money & lives.

We NEED them, see?

Has anyone ever wondered: what if the government suddenly turned around and said, “no.”? No money this week! No social security check this week? This is beyond most of our imagination. I mean, don’t the People own the government? I mean, we can FIRE them, can’t we? What about the Constitution, right?

I say, “Are you so sure about that?”

See, the Founding Fathers understood the tyranny of centralized government. They came from England- and a long, long history of a Monarchy, a King. Their succession of kings and queens murdered thousands and thousands on the town square because they did or didn’t believe that the bread literally became the body of Christ. And with each new king/queen, the People were TERRIFIED which direction they would go. After all, it was up to just. one. person.

Eventually, as humans will do, the People began to question this way of doing things. The winds of revolution began to blow. (more…)

Ok.  I read the following Fox News title and had what my dear father refers to as a, ‘conniption:’

“New Obama Directive Will Shorten Visa Wait for Illegal Aliens With U.S. Spouses”

kingbo

Why the conniption? Because even the title is wrong!  Forget the actual story- let’s talk about that title! Obama’s DIRECTIVE? So, we have a king now? And that isn’t the news? It is the assumption? I tell you, FOX is not a ‘Conservative’ news source. They lean juuuuuust right enough to lay claim to GOP interests, but let me tell you, no Conservative could get past this title without sputtering! A ‘directive’ from the boy king? A DIRECTIVE? I ask you, “WHY DO WE NEED CONGRESS?” The article mentions Obama creating new directives as if that were the new norm. As if the nature of the directive, and not the fact of the directive, is the actual point. Really? Really? I. DON’T. THINK. SO!

Because I can’t get past that assumption, People.  I can’t get past the very idea that we have a boy king who can even give directives.  I really don’t care what that directive is.  He had no right to give it.  Thus, it is entirely invalid.  And yet, here is a news outlet framing the argument and building in the notion that Obama has any power to make law.

Do not  allow the Progressives to frame the argument, Friends.  It is their very favorite trick.  That is how they hope to win.  They build in assumptions in an effort to solidify them in your mind before you even begin the debate.  Example: “Why do you need guns?  Is there so much crime that you need to carry a gun everywhere?”   See, if you answer that question, you have also accepted a mighty big assumption: that the person has the right to ask it of you.  But they don’t.   Especially in the context of whether you should retain your right!   If they can ask you why you need to have an inalienable right as defined by the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, then you can ask them, “Why do you need to be practice homosexuality?”  If we can ask the question, it implies that the person’s right is open for discussion and validation.  See? (more…)

"I'll tell you what, I'll give you security in exhange for your liberties, ok?"

The day that I agree with the ACLU is the day that confirms my belief that the world has truly turned upside down.  That day is today.  The ACLU is demanding transparency & legal justification for the killing of American born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, his teen age son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki (a U.S. citizen who was born in Denver in 1995), and his 17-year-old Yemeni cousin that were killed in a U.S. military drone strike that left nine people dead in southeastern Yemen.

Obama claims this Colorado boy was Al Qaida and needed to die.

While the death of Anwar al-Awlaki seems perfectly legal & just (as he was actively participating in war against his own country), the question remains open about his young son, another unnamed US citizen & his 17-year-old cousin (not to mention the nine possibly innocent Yemenis citizens) that were killed along with him.  Just when does the life of one bad man start providing perfect justification for the killing of children & innocents?  In our nation today, if a gang member decides to kill an enemy, but carelessly sprays the street with machine gun fire regardless of children and other innocent victims, we punish him even more strenuously than if he had simply killed his one sworn enemy.  I thought this was a standard notion in our nation. (more…)

"Vee Vill Get Zee Names!"

I can’t believe I just said that.  But I did.  As a result of the Fast n Furious Debacle, Eric Holder (or should I say, Obama) has just ordered the Justice Department to take away our Second Amendment rights- you know, the right to bear arms- the right to raise a private militia, the right to stand up to our own government should it become tyrannical?  Yeah, that one.

The Justice Department is now ordering five southern states to report the names of any private citizen who purchases high-powered assault weapons.  Even though no one, I mean no one, believes that Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry, was killed by an American citizen.  Even though it was it the Justice Department who intentionally sent high powered assault rifles into Mexico- not American citizens.

No act of Congress to repeal the Second Amendment.  Just an arrogant order- from our new king.  I don’t know about you, but that makes my skin crawl. (more…)

Would We Have America Today If Guns Were Illegal Then?

Umm humm.  What did I just say?  Who benefits from assault weapons in Mexico?  Why, the Progressive Liberals & Obama, of course.  And even more importantly, the powerful families behind the banks and the news who have other plans for our nation.  Legal sales of high-powered assault weapons allows Constitutionally approved uprisings of Americans against their own government if it fails to adhere to our Constitution.

Ok, we got gun control. Next on the agenda: Ideas on how to eliminate the American borders?

As these powerful elites plan on very bad things for the United States, namely its demise in favor of a new American Union with more centralized control, they need to make sure that Americans can not fight back.

No weapons = No Revolt.  And ‘They’ know it. (more…)

We, according to our own American Declaration of Independence, have the right to dissolve our government.  Read here, our original Declaration of Independence:

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to
assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which
the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the
opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel
them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among
these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these
rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from
the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles
and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that
Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient
causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more
disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by
abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of
abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to
reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to
throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future
security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is
now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of
Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of
repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment
of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted
to a candid world
.”

Let us Declare Our Independence from this Corrupt Government that blights our Land and Replace them with the Government that was outlined by our great documents. (more…)

Hey, let's confuse some adopted kids now!

If you are uninitiated, this might seem a little illogical.  Liberals advocating extreme freedom from decency (gay marriage, gay adoption, killing of viable fetuses) and yet, allowing the Man into people’s private data.  But for those in the know, we understand the plan very well.

These are the Americans who 'really' care about kids. Say, Any advice on how to woo a girl, Dad?

The plan of progressive liberals is to create an entirely different version of the United States than most of us have ever known and wanted.  They wish to turn the Constitution on its ear, allowing the profane to flourish and the sympathetic police forces the ability to punish their detractors in the future. (more…)

D.C. Arrests Reporter for Recording Public Meeting.

D.C. Reporter Gets Arrested for Recording At a Public Meeting is just the latest in a continuing string of government folk ignoring citizen’s Constitutional rights. And this time, not the rights of a private citizen but those of a member of the news media.

If you’re paying attention, you’ve noticed increasing numbers of stories reporting peoples’ arrests  more..