URGENT UPDATE on Connecticut Shooting
It’s very difficult for me to write this update because what has happened to this article is almost unbelievable. It has been altered by persons unknown to me. In other words, it was hacked and important information was stripped from it. I discovered these alterations only after my rape/defamation trial- I found it only because it was used in court to influence both the jurors and the public against me. I never worried that this article was referenced by David Wil Riggins’ attorney because it was well written, complete and full of factual information backed with videos, reliable mainstream news articles and an irrefutable timeline of events that would make any reasonable person question the series of events on that terrible day in Sandy Hook, CN. After my trial, merely out of curiosity, I checked this article and was shocked to my core to find it so brutally hacked. All my hard work had been deleted. Entire pages of work had been deleted. All my articles, videos, proof and evidence had been wiped clean. I immediately checked my WordPress Revision control which keeps track of every change on an article. Indeed, according to WordPress, I wrote the original of this article in 2017 as there is no longer any record of me having wrote it in 2012. All my original revisions have been deleted. As you will see below, only ragged, nonsensical sentences were simply hacked together and no longer made any sense. Whoever did this to my article was savvy enough to delete the revision control record as well. That took some know-how. I sat stunned. No wonder people scoffed.
In a mad panic, I decided to check some of my other high profile articles to see if something similar had happened to them. Sure enough, it had. My article, “Who Is Rupert Murdoch & Who Controls the News?” has also been hacked. That article had all its images, charts and photos of the major media owners removed- luckily I found a computer copy and reinstated it. Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to find a copy of this article on my own drive. I have decided to rebuild this article.
Originally, this article contained the following: a detailed timeline all the media events that unfolded on the day Adam Lanza allegedly shot children at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Included on that timeline were additional events in the following days, including coroner reports, interviews with friends, family, teachers, officials, residents. I also updated the original article two weeks after it was originally published to announce the connection between Sandy Hook and Obama’s 23 Executive Orders . That is the reason this article is called, ‘Critical UPDATE…etc” Originally, I anticipated restrictive gun legislation and/or a signing of the UN Small Arms Treaty to be the result of what I considered to be a government conspiracy. However, when Obama released the most outrageous set of 23 executive orders that essentially dissolved our Bill of Rights two weeks after Sandy Hook, I knew I needed to update this article and make the link public. I felt doubly convinced that Sandy Hook was linked to a criminal intention to subjugate the freedoms of the American People. Whether children were murdered is no longer the issue. What is at issue now is whether we can efficiently inform the American people about the 23 Executive Orders and whether we can reverse them. This absolutely critical link to the 23 Executive Orders was also deleted completely from this article.
I also included an update a year after the event when Sandy Hook released the official police report of the event. The police report was completely different from the events reported on the day of the event and I highlighted the various discrepancies. The most egregious discrepancies came in the form of the weapons found on Lanza’s body. The police report claimed a long gun was found on the body- when every news report from the day said that no long gun was found on the body. In fact, the long guns were shown, via videos, being taken from the car. The police report shows photos of the front of what appears to be a different school. I showed the photos and those from the original news shots from the day of the event. There were other items I questioned, including why not a single major news station reported that Sandy Hook Police had finally completed their official report from the event. Here are just some of the other kinds of information in the original article that were deleted by whomever hacked my blog. I will be working to update this article. :
- (Note: I will be working to piece the story together again over time. As I obtain the information, I will be updating it.)
- -if no one was an actual witness to the shootings, how did the rumor begin, so early in the shootings, that a Lanza brother was involved? Who saw him from the beginning? Makes no sense.
- -discrepancies about the video security camera at the front of the school. The first newscasts said that Lanza was recognized by the office staff via a video camera. It said they recognized him because he was the son of a kindergartner teacher there. That is how he allegedly got in.
- The following video is a news report talking about the new security system that was installed only one year prior to the shooting. At this time, absolutely no one saw a gaping hole in the front of the school. It’s also clear that the theory had not even been circulated yet. Witnesses were all standing around the FRONT of the school wondering how Adam Lanza allegedly got into the school. Everyone was wondering how Lanza got in for a long time. They would have seen the massive hole that suddenly appeared days after the shooting.
- -Different stories by the media about how Lanza entered the building
- -discrepancies about Lanza entering the building by breaking a window in the back of the school instead
(Last note: You will note that the last part of this article is actually the ‘original’ article- what pieces that remained. It is not well written anymore and may be disjointed at times. I haven’t had time to completely rework it all. I’ve tried to have some journalistic integrity by leaving some of the original text ‘as is’, which means that it leaves the original conclusions that I made at the time. You will note that all the ideas and data that I spoke of above are completely missing below. I am still considering how best to address the future of this article. Some of it has been updated with new videos while some has been left in its original state. If you have an idea of how best to proceed journalistically, leave me a comment.)
The following video gives the images of a police report released a month after the shooting. Please pay special attention to the picture of the front door of the school where Lanza allegedly shot through it in order to make entry.
I took a screenshot of the front door image in this video for you and posted it below. (It is located at point 0:28 in the police video) if you want to confirm it yourself.
It is a completely different front door to the one shown for Sandy hook in the next video (below) shown just days after the shooting! The following is a screenshot from a helicopter view of the window that was allegedly shot out from Sandy Hook from an ABC news reports! This screenshot was taken at 0:20 of the helicopter video of Sandy Hook days after the alleged shooting!**see NOTE below
It is found at point 0:20 on the following video:
Note that the two windows are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. How can that be? Did Lanza shoot out two front door? Did Sandy Hook elementary school have two front doors? Or was the report falsified? Just as the two rifles that suddenly appeared on Lanza’s body were falsified on it? Why did the Newton, CN police force falsify their police report?
**NOTE: It also gives a photo of Lanza’s car(at point 0:57). The report then shows the rifle at point 1:01 and says it was found ‘near the car’. Here is a screenshot of the rifle. Note the cutouts in the stock. This is clearly the same rifle that was pulled out of the video below.
Meanwhile, the rifle was found IN the car. It is exactly the same rifle seen in the video This report completely contradicts all official counts. It was found, and proven through video evidence, in the car. Then, the police report said it was found on Lanza’s body. The coroner said all wounds were from long rifles, not hand guns. And now, this report says the rifle was found ‘near’ the car. Then, it gives a car in the parking lot that has bullet holes all over it at point 1:08. At no time during any media report is there any mention of anyone firing any guns in the parking lot. This image makes no sense at all.
- -discrepancies in stories of the office staff and how the principal and psychologist got shot
- The following video states that Adam Lanza allegedly had an altercation with four staff members at the school the day before the shooting. The information was very specific and was from ‘a couple of officials’. At 0:10 Reporter says that initial reports state Lanza’s mother was a teacher, but wasn’t. At 0:43, he states that ‘a couple officials’ confirmed that on Dec. 13, Lanza had gotten into an altercation with four school staff members, 3 of whom were shot dead that day. The fourth didn’t come to school that day but was being interviewed by the FBI. There has been no followup about this fourth individual since this report. Also, this report says that ‘valuable evidence’ was found at Lanza’s home that would lead to a motive for ‘why’ he did it. None of this alleged evidence was ever released.
- The following video says there was no altercation at all. So far, no motive at all.
- -Some children interviewed said that heard the shooter running outside of their window. Who was that?
- -questions about how and why all the police knew to cover the children’s eyes as they left the school- who gave the order and why?
- The following video/news report states that “several federal and state officials” are clarifying the initial reports that it wasn’t only TWO handguns, but FOUR handguns that were found “inside the school”, but “only handguns”. The rifle (singular), “AR-15 style” was brought to the school but “left in his mother’s car”. The officials also state that Lanza attempted to buy a third rifle but was DENIED the purchase due to Connecticut’s tough gun laws. He also mentions Dec. 13 and the alleged altercation Lanza had with four staff members of Sandy Hook.
- The following video shows the police taking at least one rifle from the car. In it, we can clearly see a black rifle with a butt that has three (or perhaps two) spaces cut out of it. This is exactly the same weapon that is pictured in the final police report that states it was found ‘near’ the car. I’ve included screenshots of the weapon taken at 0:13,0:14,0:15 to show the stock of the weapon. They are shown after the video below.
- All the above reports clearly state that rifles were found in car and none on the body. And yet, here we have the coroner saying the very next day, after the shootings, that ALL the wounds on the children were from a ‘long rifle’. At 1:08 in the video, he states that all the children’s autopsies were completed by 1:30 that day. At 4:33 in the video, he says that “all the wounds that I know of were caused by the long rifle.” When he was asked about the calibre of the bullet used, he said, “I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists,” confirming that he could not be mistaken about what he saw. Later, I found the Newton Police report from the shooting. It also said that 2 rifles were found on Lanza’s body- including the Bushmaster. Even though we saw the Bushmaster being pulled out of Lanza’s car in the video above. Someone falsified the report and/or the situation. The coroner is either lying or is telling the truth of what he saw and something very different happened inside the school. But one thing is certain: Adam Lanza’s two rifles were found in his car. Two or four HANDguns were found on Lanza’s body on the day he was found by local police. Something happened between then and the police report that resulted in the police report saying that the rifles were found on Lanza’s body. Something happened to cause the children’s wounds to be caused by long rifles and not the handguns found on Lanza’s body. Something happened to make the coroner say that ALL the wounds on the children were caused by long rifles and not the handguns found on Adam Lanza.
- The following video contains several damning news reports, each with important news pieces. Beneath the video, I’ve given time points in the video that contain these news points. You can either watch the entire video or go to these news points.
- At 0:39 in the video, you hear that a teacher was shot in the foot and was being treated at the hospital. And yet, we have never heard witness testimony from this teacher again. What did this teacher see? Surely, this teacher must have seen the person who shot him/her.
- At 1:18 in the video, it is clear that the news stations had been leaked the names of the Lanza brothers from the very beginning of the shooting.
- 1:42 The Reporters state that one Lanza is dead and the other ‘is being questioned’. However, we learn later that Ryan Lanza was not even in town at the time of the shooting. He heard about it while driving in his car and sped home to clear his name. So, who was in custody and being questioned? And who leaked the Lanza brother’s names?
- 7:48 Reporters talk about how well known the Lanza brothers and family are in the community. No one ever says that police have confirmed the name of the shooter.
- 8:00 Different news stations reports that a man wearing camo pants is escorted out of the woods saying, “it wasn’t me, it wasn’t me.” Reporter says it is Lanza’s brother Ryan. Says Adam Lanza was also wearing camo pants. Again, we find out later that Ryan Lanza was not even in town.
- 11:35 “Multiple sources were calling him ‘Ryan Lanza’… perhaps there’s been some confusion from law enforcement agencies when the brother was taken into custody.” “We do know the brother’s in custody.”
- 11:54 “We do know that it’s a person whose surname is Lanza and whose mother was a kindergarten teacher at Sandy Hook elementary school and who was killed this morning in her classroom.” Newscaster reports that Lanza’s mother was a kindergartner teacher who was killed and all her students were killed with her. She states/implies that all the students that were killed were the kids in that classroom.
- 12:27 Parents received text messages at 9:30 a.m. that something was wrong and parents that could, took their kids home. (and yet, one mother of an alleged victim stated on a t.v. interview below that she received a phone call that something was wrong. She inadvertently changes her story at the end of the interview.).
- 12:44- Danbury hospital treated the wounded
- 16:09- This reporter just interviewed the Sandy Hook nurse who said that she saw the shooter ‘eye to eye’ and that he let her live. (she later gives a very tearful, believable interview where she says she never saw his face- just the shadow of his boots outside of a door). The reporter asked the nurse if she knew about Lanza as a student- ie, was he known to make trouble, etc. Also, she asked about his mother, who was known to work there as a kindergartner teacher. The reporter says that the nurse said that Lanza never acted out in any way and that the mother, the kindergartner teacher, was ‘loving, caring, experienced kindergarten teacher.” The only problem with these statements is this: NEITHER LANZA NOR HIS MOTHER EVER ATTENDED OR WORKED FOR SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. This part of the video is actually shown in full below in the next video.
- At point 1:19 in the following is a video, a USA Today reporter states that she interviewed the Sandy Hook nurse who stated that Lanza walked into the nurse’s office where she “met eyes with the shooter, jumped under her desk and inexplicably, the shooter walked away” and thus, was a living witness to his face. However, this same nurse gave several interviews later to news outlets saying she was in a closet and only saw his boots under the doorway. The reporter also says that she asked if it was ‘known around the school that Lanza, a child of a kindergarten teacher, was an issue, whether or not he had any problems’ and she said, “Not at all”. I asked if she knew the mother of the suspect and she said that she did and she said that she was a ‘Absolutely loving person, and a very caring, experienced kindergarten teacher, just the kind of person you would want with your 5 year old children.” The only problem with these statements is this: NEITHER LANZA NOR HIS MOTHER EVER ATTENDED OR WORKED FOR SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
- In the following video, we see that Ryan Lanza was not even in Newtown, CN, but in Hoboken, NJ during the shooting. So how could he have ‘been in custody’ or be ‘interrogated by officials’ as the original news reports said? He is being arrested near his home. He was writing ‘I didn’t do it, I didn’t do it!” on his Facebook page after his brother had allegedly shot himself at the school. In this video, reports are being spread that his mother was shot in her HOME, not the school. But no one is yet asking why Adam Lanza shot up the school yet. No one seems aware that his mother has no connection at all with the school- and neither does he.
- -discrepancies about a man in the woods who was arrested by the police. As you can see, various news reports have talked about the mysterious man in the woods. Many have said that it was definitely one of the Lanza brothers and that he was being questioned. We find later that Ryan Lanza was in another state altogether and was arrested days later. No mention is ever made of the man in the woods again. Who was he? There was also a man who was caught outside the school who turned out to be a father of a student. He was originally detained by the police but was quickly released. There was a news video of him verifying that he was not the ‘man in the woods’. I am still trying to find those videos again.
- -Oddity of Peter Lanza allegedly giving interviews to media but there are no actual videos of him speaking. Just a guy who speaks for him.
- -Link to the Sandy Hook, Connecticut police report that came out that said 2 rifles had miraculously been found on the body, thus correlating the coroner’s amazing press conference on the day of shooting.
- -How fake the parents’ crying and emotions seem to be. None are believable in the least. (The next video has photos at the end that I don’t understand. Forget those. Just focus on the interview given at the beginning. How bizarre and fake is that?)
- Again, this video ends with a cartoon and laughter at the end. Forget the banal stupidity of that and focus on the fakeness of this supposedly grieving mother. If your baby had been gunned down at school, would you talk like this? Would you say ‘care giver’? Would you mention politics? Would you forget if you had gotten a call or text telling you about the death of your child? Would you have just put the phone away after getting a call telling you your kid was shot? Or that there had been a shooting at school? Would you be giving interviews afterward? I don’t think so. I would not be mended- ever. My life would be blackness. And the last thing I would want is to serve anyone for any purpose. I would be curled up on my baby’s bed, smelling the last smells of her bed and blanket before they were gone. This woman is a complete fake. Any normal mother can feel it.
- In the next video, we have the father of Emily Parker- an alleged victim of Sandy Hook. Here he is, DIRECTLY after the supposed murder of his angel, laughing and then clearly rearranging his face when he thinks the camera’s are on. You can even see his mouth say, “Is the camera on?” before he begins acting. Throughout his bizarre speech, he looks as if he is about to burst out laughing. This is not the speech of a father. It is the speech of a really bad actor. It’s very uncomfortable to watch.
- -Update to article discussing the demolition of the school and why it made further investigation impossible. why it makes the entire incident more suspicious.
- The following video shows that Adam’s mother was well known, well liked and respected in her community. She was known to be a good mother who would do anything to help her son, Adam, whom everyone knew to have difficulties. It’s clear from this video and the next, that Adam was ‘painfully shy’. He was also very smart. Most of his issues seem to be his timidness when it came to social interactions. He seemed to shun others, not to be shunned or bullied by anyone. He was homeschooled by his mother. That might be why he wasn’t bullied. It appears that Adam was raised with a great deal of love from a doting, full time mother. He was also raised without any material wants as his mother was well off from her divorce. Children from loving homes don’t turn into violent mass murderers. Asperger’s sufferers aren’t known for violence either. I find it very interesting how the rumor began that she was a teacher at the school in the first place when she never had anything to do with the school at all. Indeed, she never had a job as she was well off.
- The following video is an interview with a friend of Adam Lanza’s who describes his personality and his disease. Listening to this young man describe the incredible shyness of Adam Lanza makes one think of the impossibility of such a boy carrying off such a commando style shooting. Especially one that didn’t leave a single living witness. No one who knew him thought he was capable of such behavior. He was so shy that he would ‘hug the walls’ of the school because he was afraid of people. He couldn’t meet anyone’s eyes. (And yet, one reporter said that the school nurse she interviewed said she saw Lanza and stared at him ‘eye to eye’ and that he let her go.) Does that sound like someone who can boldly run down a school hallway and murder at will? Especially after confronted by teachers and the principal? Does that sound like someone who can boldly run up to the front of the school with two rifles, four hand guns, shoot out the front window and shoot two people before running down the hallway to shoot little kids for no reason at all? In front of the entire world? A kid who is so shy that he puts black plastic bags and duct tape over his bedroom windows? A kid who has to plan can run up to the front of the school, in front of the world and shoot it out? Here is a friend of his stating his complete shock upon hearing Adam Lanza’s name as the shooter:
(NOTE: Here is what was left of the original article:)
Friends, there is something wrong with the way Sandy Hook is being reported to the American public. Just like Benghazi. Almost on day one, I told my husband: “The facts don’t make sense. Something is wrong here.” Last night, after I saw a talking head interview (or, I should say, NOT interview) the father of the boy who saw his teacher get shot and ran for his life with a couple of friends, I told my husband, “Something is not right here. She didn’t ask a single relevant question. So far, this boy is the only eye-witness of the gunman coming forward. She didn’t ask if the boy saw one or more shooters. She didn’t ask any details of what the gunman did first, second, third. She didn’t ask for a description of the gunman. These reporters are complete prostitutes. They could care less about the feelings of the people they interview. So why didn’t she ask any of these questions?” In fact, I could tell she was biting back questions. I looked at my husband and said, “Cal, this thing just doesn’t make any sense- something is terribly wrong. By now, there should be many eye-witness accounts of the actual gunman. There should be breathless survivors talking about how this guy walked by their room, etc. About how they narrowly escaped. But so far, it looks like every single eye-witness is dead. That is IMPOSSIBLE!”
I watched the situation LIVE. There were original reports of a second man who was found in the woods that they had put in custody. Police radio scans and video show that a man was FLEEING in the woods and was taken down- this man was never talked about. This man was NEVER spoken of again. While some rumors surfaced that a volunteer father was mistakenly handcuffed- it DOES explain if he was the same one who fled and who was thrown to the ground. Why? The details of the shooting changed enormously from one minute to the next. Inside sources at the police departments were reporting one thing while the official accounts said completely different information. The news reports were full of such ambiguous NON statements that I was furiously looking throughout the internet to find solid evidence or eye-witness accounts to clarify. None was to be found. One example: They originally said that the shooter was buzzed in via the front office’s new video security system. Then, the news report said, “The shooter was NOT voluntarily buzzed into the school.” What the heck does THAT mean? Does that mean he forced his way through the system? Does that mean they have video evidence of his face? Does that mean that there was someone on the inside putting a gun to someone’s head to buzz the shooter in? Was there a video of his entrance or not?
Also, it seems highly unlikely, based on descriptions of Adam, that he could have purchased all that black ops gear! The guy is described as being so shy that he would hug the school walls when someone approached him! Also, first the news definitely says the mother was a teacher and the classroom of dead kids was her class. Then, reports are that she had nothing to do with the school. So, why the shooting there? Also, the number and kind of weapons used changed. Also, where they discovered the weapons. Sometimes they reported that all the weapons were in the school. Then they said the rifle was in the car. But they also said that the shooter used the rifle to kill every single person with multiple shots.
Then the coroner said all the wounds were caused by a RIFLE! Then only HANDGUNS were discovered with the body of Adam Lanza. The rifle was found in the CAR.
No answers for this disparity are forthcoming.
No, something is terribly wrong here. The lack of eye witnesses of the shooter confirming the single shooter account is GLARINGLY absent. The reports of a second shooter in the woods has suddenly disappeared. The reporters are not grilling (NOTE: This is another hack. I would never advocate the ‘grilling’ of young children) the one and only witness we know of- this little boy (more specifically, his father). Please don’t say they suddenly have even a smidge of conscience. The original statements about the shooter being buzzed into the school have simply disappeared. I was ready to let this go and explain it away as simple confusion. I was maddened by the timing and circumstances of the tragedy as concerns the upcoming UN small arms treaty & gun control. It killed me that this wack-job used LEGALLY REGISTERED weapons to do his killing. There is NO OTHER CONCLUSION, if the story is accurate, than the fact that had Adam Lanza NOT had access to those legal guns, he could never have killed those kids. He was too mentally ill to have gotten those weapons himself. He was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome and we now know that he had many, many interventions by school officials in the past. I felt that the killing of little children would be the strongest argument yet that we should clamp down on gun ownership. I just couldn’t believe the TIMING and circumstances of this event- a GIFT to the Progressives to disarm us. Who can argue with this case? I was ready for the inevitable.
But a friend sent me the following links which tell a different story. Having reported the event LIVE and experienced the changing information, I am not surprised. In fact, it makes sense now.
Friends. I believe there is evidence of more than one shooter. I believe this was a PLANNED event- specifically to get the UN Small Arms Treaty signed.
The father of the shooter is Peter Lanza, Tax Director and Vice President at GE Energy Financial Services , is rumored to be scheduled to testify on the international LIBOR scandal-a worldwide banking corruption scheme that has cost over $4 BILLION to consumers. Guess who else is rumored to be scheduled to testify on the LIBOR scandal? Father of the BATMAN theater shooter, Robert M. Holmes, a senior lead scientist at the San Diego office of Minneapolis-based FICO . He is a mathematician who has developed predictive models for financial services, and credit and fraud risk models. He is one of several scientists who patented a predictive model system used to detect telecommunications fraud. FRAUD. And expert at fraud taking place over telecommunications equipment & lines. And he works for FICO- which determines a person’s CREDIT SCORE. LIBOR is very similar in that it determines the HEALTH of the bank and its ability to borrow cheaply. Amazing coincidence? We will see. The LIBOR scandal is a massive, worldwide network of banks, the Federal Reserve and highly position individuals such as Tim Geihtner and Ben Bernanke that are being accused of manipulating LIBOR rates to gain better market positions. Just some of the Banks involved are: the Canadian branches of the Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Bank, and Citibank, as well as ICAP (Intercapital), an interdealer broker.[37 It also mentions Bank of America & Barclays. It is ugly to its roots and VERY powerful people are involved.
There were many who questioned the Aurora shooting. I was one who scoffed. But now, with Sandy Hook, I am willing to look at it again. One again we have a situation where the shooter was masked and in full body armor. No eye witness ties to the shooter’s face. And a shooter who consistently looks drugged or ‘out of it’. And yet, they claim he is not taking any drugs. And if THAT is what Holmes looks like when he’s NORMAL, how could he have stayed awake long enough to pull off his murderous rage? And they found him peacefully sitting in his vehicle after the shooting. Why didn’t he shoot himself? Why didn’t he flee? Why the comatose pose in his car? It bothers me to no end that with such widespread ‘conspiracy theories’ filling the internet, the connection to LIBOR is not simply denied by Congress. Someone did deny the connection- but they wished to remain anonymous. Why?
I believe our government (or some faction of the government) has created a giant lie with Sandy Hook. I’m coming to believe that no children were killed at all- but were staged to look as if they were. One: If these men are involved in the LIBOR scandal, they can manipulate their testimony. Two: they get gun control. How very, very clever and efficient of them, right? I hate to say it. I hate to put myself ‘out there’ with this because I KNOW how I will be attacked. But I don’t do this for anyone’s approval. I do it to help the American People. You look at these links and you decide. (Note: Only a few days since writing this article, Obama released, not one, not two, but TWENTY THREE executive orders that are the most devastating blow to our civil rights I have ever seen. And they aren’t limited to gun control. They basically overturn our entire Bill of Rights. See my article: Obama 23 Executive Orders = The Dissolution of the Bill of Rights .
*****ATTENTION: This bulk of this article has been removed through anonymous hacking activities. Since the writing of this article and another article which was also hacked, “Who is Rupert Murdoch and Who Owns the News?”, I have been sued for defamation in a rape case (in which I am the rape victim). I had all the evidence I needed to not only win this case, but had I wanted to, probably could have won a criminal case against my rapist. But that did not happen. Instead, I found myself at the losing end of a $8 million one of a kind ridiculous defamation lawsuit that has literally never been seen before and probably will never be seen again in this nation. Can anyone say, “Punishment for speaking out?”
This article was used against me both in court and in the news concerning my trial. It is probably the number one most prejudicial tool used against me with the public, the federal judge pool and with the jurors. Thus, the fact that it was hacked to make me look ignorant, illiterate and cruel went a long way to making my life miserable.
People love to call dismissive names when things make them uncomfortable and I understand. But add Facebook, Google and Bing’s efforts to these hacked articles and what you get is an ugly picture, my friends. Those progressive elites don’t like intelligent, conservative Christians who can put on a logical argument. Especially when it unearth’s their true agenda. They enjoy it when Christian conservatives talk about the illuminati, Christ’s return, secret societies, evolution, science, etc, in ignorant terms but oh, they do not like it when an intelligent person steps into the ring. And they especially don’t like it when that person is truly altruistic. That, my friends, is dangerous to them. And so, like all Progressive liberals, they need to CHEAT. And LIE. And HURT. And SILENCE. They know they are evil, selfish and no good. Ultimately, logic proves them wrong.
A person who does good for the sake of doing good is someone you can’t buy or bribe. You need to kill them to silence them. What is happening to me is just the first step in that process. It’s called intimidation. They are trying their best to destroy me. They think that if they destroy my reputation, take my money, make me a slave, perhaps even strike a wedge between my husband and me, they can break my resolve and strength.
The funny thing is this: I’m as strong as ever. I’m just not sure how effective I can be anymore. These people own communications. I tried to warn people, but they didn’t listen. I suppose we all deserve what is coming. If I write the truth and no one hears, did I write? ha. That is why I’ve stopped writing.
I can only believe that even though my work is done, there are other God inspired people out there. Indeed, I know there are. People with the power to go around these eggheads who think they can control every human being on earth. Cream always rises to the top and crap always ends up flushed down the drain. Hope is eternal. Perhaps I will write again someday. We will see.