Skip to content

Let’s Talk About Trump’s Muslim “Solution”….

Trump moves to ban even U.S. Citizens based on their religion. Critical mistake. Citizen rights are protected under our Constitution.

Trump moves to ban even U.S. Citizens based on their religion. Critical mistake. Citizen rights are protected under our Constitution.

Ok. About Trump’s call to ban all Muslims’ entry into the U.S.A. First, most of you should be aware that he is not only referring to non-citizens, he is referring to U.S. citizens as well. If they leave the country for vacation, they will not be allowed back in.

The very first thing to consider about all government action, especially those authorized toward U.S. citizens, is that it can be done to you.  If you don’t want the government to have the power to do it to you, don’t give it the power to do it to anyone else. If you don’t want the government to ban Christians from coming or going through USA borders, then you should never support this kind of garbage from any political leader- no matter how tempting it might sound.   Oh, and don’t let the word, “temporary” fool you.  Once a power is given, it is given forever.  I want you to give me an example of a power that was given to government that it ever relinquished.  Just look at what happened to the executive order.  I rest my case.

A much better solution to the problem is Islamic terrorists entering our borders is intelligent profiling.  Yes, what happened to that option.  Rather than throw our constitution out of the door, why not just let granny and the babies go through security without molestation and intelligently decide that men of fighting age from Muslim countries should be frisked- all the time.  I could go for that one.  And Muslim ladies who insist on burkas?  Frisk them too.  Sorry, but those hide too much.   Let’s try something intelligent before we lose our heads.

I find it frightening that, according to the latest  “Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 66% of likely Republican Voters favor a temporary ban on all Muslims entering the United States until the federal government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists from coming here. Just 24% oppose the plan, with 10% undecided.Among all voters, 46% favor a temporary ban on Muslims entering the United States, while 40% are opposed. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided.”

Remember I told you that there is no Democrat Party and no GOP Party anymore? Just Progressives that use both sides of the political spectrum to accomplish the same end? Basically use both parties to give the illusion that we have a choice? Well, this is an example of the progressive elite using so-called Republican to accomplish their end: the destruction of the Constitution and everything it stands for: LIBERTY and EQUALITY under the LAW. Now, if you want to destroy that document, then by all means, support this type of legislation and vote with your emotions like an unruly mob. Then, you will have to reap the consequences of it when Christians become the targets. I will have absolutely no pity on you when this happens. None. I will be the first one to say, “You deserve it.”

You can’t be a numbskull and allow yourself to be so easily manipulated. You are smarter than that. You are more educated than that. You are a longer term thinker than that. Don’t play into the enemies’ hands so easily. Don’t give away your rights so easily.

There is a reason we allow idiots to burn flags- if we stopped them, they will stop us. Remember, regimes change and turn around is fair play. Never believe that a law, once made, will not be turned around on you. It will be.

Knee jerk, emotional responses in terms of law making is just plain, out and out stupid. It’s shooting yourself in your own head. Why do you think they have been tormenting you all this while with Muslim attacks? Because Muslims can win any kind of war with us? Heck no! They don’t have the guns, the man power or the knowledge to do that. It is all a mind game to manipulate you into killing yourself. Looks like it’s working, too.
If you destroy your own rights, then you have done their job for them.

I hope none of you are supporting this. It makes us look.. well, infantile. Unintelligent. Unschooled. Undisciplined. Shortsighted. Easily Manipulated. What more can I say? If you are thinking this way, please reconsider and for Goodness sake, take down those stupid memes supporting this action on Facebook. It’s embarrassing.

related links:


  1. Hello Short Little Rebel. I love to read your blogs. God has definitely gifted you in knowledge and speech.
    I would enjoy very much meeting you in person over a cup of coffee. My treat of course. My wife and I live in the Seattle area. I think I read somewhere that you may also. If you are available, please let us know. God bless you and Merry Christmas to you and your family.
    Private note:

    • Hello, Michael, what a nice thing to say! I do live in the Seattle land area- but I am very surprised to find a fan in this area. Most people here are uber liberal atheists who would not like most of what I say. I feel rather out of place here in the bluest of the blue states. I see you read the article about Trump’s Muslim Solution. Yes, I didn’t and don’t support such ideas. And of course, he is now backing off of it. It was just a political stunt to draw in the crowds that are frustrated and angry with Islamic terrorism. I understand the emotion, but the solution must be legal and practical. I’m not a Republican, but a fierce independent. I honestly feel that if we got a group of almost any Americans off the street and gave them the same problems to handle as those given to Congress, we would do a better job. But this would only be because we weren’t burdened by previous bribes, promises, and personal strategies. If it were merely an intellectual puzzle, it would be easy to solve. It’s not rocket science. Unfortunately, it’s not just an intellectual puzzle. There are so many underhanded things happening on the personal levels of each politician and on group levels. This is why government never seems to do the most logical things. As to the party politics, I no longer believe either party stands for what they originally stood for. I believe there is another group, called the Progressives, who are infiltrating both parties. This group wants the demise of nation states altogether (in favor of a one world government) and is using both parties and their platforms to accomplish that end. It is against them that I fight.

      In any case, I’m not sure if I can make coffee with a complete stranger, but I do appreciate the offer! Thanks, Susan

      • Hello Susan,
        Thank you for taking the time to respond back. You are right about living in a very liberal area. There are a lot of conservatives also in the greater Seattle area that share your passion for God and Country. You can meet Kerri and I at our business website
        I hope you don’t feel too alone in this area. Please keep up the good fight. God is amazing and so are you.

      • That’s a wonderful idea. Thank you. If I am down in the Seattle area, I will try to stop in. I’m actually a bit north of Seattle. Merry Christmas to you and your wife- to all your family! Susan

  2. While I understand your concern that by not allowing a certain ethnic nationality of people enter the country that we are careening down a slippery slope; I disagree. During WW-II the United States Government stopped Italian, German, Russian, and Japanese from immigrating to the USA. We had no way of vetting these immigrants, and feared as we do now with practitioners of islam that they would seek to attack us from within. These attacks by islamic followers have already happened on our soil. Yet our government seizes every opportunity to down play these attacks as “work place violence”! What B.S.!

    So here’s the question: Have we as a nation maintained that slippery slope of not allowing ethnic Japanese, German, Russian, Italians, from entering the USA since WW-II?

    I firmly believe that Trump should keep his word and STOP ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION TO THE USA. Until which time the current followers of islam are given the same choice that Mac Arthur gave the followers of Shintoism if they want to continue to live within the borders of the United States of America. Why? Because islamic law (sharia) and our Constitution are not compatible and cannot stand together in a Constitutional Republic.

    • Hi Mark, thank you for your respectful opinion. Listen, I am voting for Trump because I will NEVER, ever vote for Hillary. I believe that a no-nonsense approach to Muslims is indeed called for at every border- including Canada and Mexico. But it should be based on age/sex/marriage status/who they are traveling with/ criminal record/ where they are coming from/travel history, etc. If a guy is 70 years old and is traveling with grandma and three grandkids, is an American citizen and has served in our military for a career, do you really think you should stop him from coming into our nation??? No way! Now, if the guy is sporting a beard, is about 20, is traveling with three other young dudes, has traveled back and forth between Syria three times in the last year and is not a citizen, you’re darned right I would stop him from entering!!!

      Can’t you see the difference? What Trump said was just political suicide and it was also wrong. I am a PATRIOT and a CONSTITUTIONALIST. Many people want to do the knee jerk reaction when bad things happen. I say, do the PRAGMATIC thing. We have Muslims who really are patriotic to this nation and want to live here. I have no intention of banning them. That WILL CREATE a problem that doesn’t exist. If Muslims are happy living here and love this nation, then they are the best solution to terrorism we could ever dream up. Creating a hostile environment to those who actually love our nation is about the dumbest thing we can do. Now, for radical Islamists, they can all say, ‘bye – bye’ for all I care.

      You will never see me, of all people, supporting Islam. But I will also not be stupid enough to change our Constitution and give up my own rights when a better solution is right there, staring us in the eyes. We have computer systems that can track people with incredible accuracy. Let’s USE them. I say, PROFILE people using useful data. That makes a heck of a lot more sense than banning everyone. If you bann everyone, then you will have to ban people serving in our military! Just think of THAT!

      • Hello Eva, good question. I suppose that is the very idea of banning Muslims from America, isn’t it? You leave and you can’t come back. What else does it mean? The fact that he included American citizens in the ban was why people, including me, up in arms. It is unconstitutional and wrong headed. He can’t do it and he won’t do it. It makes much more sense to set up a border screening of certain types of Arab Muslims. Perhaps even some from Indonesia and definitely those from Africa who might have any chance of being part of Boko haram. We need common sense guidelines, not wholesale rules that could eventually be turned against Christians someday.

  3. “I rest my case”
    You have no case you stupid mother fucking demented puppet. You are a cancer upon the earth bastard fucking scum. An enabler to all that is evil in all the history of the world. Evil evil man.

  4. ” then you should never support this kind of garbage from any political leader”

    Fuck you you low life piece of shit, enemy of all living, your God damned fake faggit pandering bs is an abomination. God damned Muslims have no part in this country or the world of the living at all you vile fuck. Your God damned claim that Christians will be banned because Muslims are banned is THE most stupid God damned statement ever made in the history of the fucking useless world that God abandoned. It is pieces of shit like you who cause its further downfall until absolutely nothing of good can be found anywhere. FUCK YOU ASSHOLE.


    2 Jo 1:9 – Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
    If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

    • For those who can’t understand Dylan’s archaic version of the Bible, here is 2 John 1:9 “9 Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take them into your house or welcome them. 11 Anyone who welcomes them shares in their wicked work.” John was talking to a female elder of a church to reject false teachers who were going out in Christ’s name but saying that Jesus either never came in the flesh or that he would not come back in the flesh. The body was seen as evil. But as we all know, Jesus WAS full flesh and fully divine as well- and thus will he return to us. We are also of flesh and spirit.

      In any case, Dylan, that verse doesn’t have much to do with the election, I don’t think. And I’m quite amazed that you would use a Bible verse after that amazing spate of .. um.. dialog. Didn’t Jesus say in Matt 15, “10 And he called the people to him and said to them, “Hear and understand: 11 it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person….18 what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person. 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. 20 These are what defile a person. ”

      I rest my case.

%d bloggers like this: